
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://proteopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rebecca+Martin</id>
	<title>Proteopedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://proteopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rebecca+Martin"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/Special:Contributions/Rebecca_Martin"/>
	<updated>2026-09-21T00:08:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953557</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953557"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:40:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintenance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufactures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phagocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in multiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophilic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE. &lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structures are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 is 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptible to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptible to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptible to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodies&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatible with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antigenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the antibody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessible. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines trigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangements that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The binding of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is interesting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon binding FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in eliciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflammation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Medicine and Science ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg, with permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited at the kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form. The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptible to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Falk, R. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot; UNC Kidney Center, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/iganephropathy.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crystallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these studies included x-ray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unanswered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953556</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953556"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:40:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintenance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufactures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phagocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in multiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophilic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE. &lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structures are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 is 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptible to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptible to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptible to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodies&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatible with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antigenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the antibody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessible. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines trigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangements that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The binding of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is interesting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon binding FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in eliciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflammation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Medicine and Science ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg, with permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited at the kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form. The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptible to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Falk, R. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot; UNC Kidney Center, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/iganephropathy.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crystallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these studies included x-ray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unanswered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Rebecca_Martin&amp;diff=953555</id>
		<title>User talk:Rebecca Martin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Rebecca_Martin&amp;diff=953555"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:34:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcome to &#039;&#039;Proteopedia&#039;&#039;!&#039;&#039;&#039; We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to watch the narrated [[Proteopedia:Video_Guide|video guide]] and use  the [[Help:Contents|help pages]] for later reference. Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Eran Hodis|Eran Hodis]] 16:31, 13 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image copyright ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Rebecca,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welcome again to Proteopedia. I noticed you uploaded the following image: [[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|300px]] . If you got this image from a journal article then it is most likely under copyright and therefore we must remove it from Proteopedia immediately. If this is the case, please let me know by editing my talk page at [[User_talk:Eran Hodis]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your quick response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Eran Hodis|Eran Hodis]] 21:34, 1 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your response Rebecca, I removed the two images, and found one more: [[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb]].  As far as I can tell, you haven&#039;t obtained permission to use this image in Proteopedia from its owners, is this correct? We can&#039;t display images that others have created without their explicit permission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Eran Hodis|Eran Hodis]] 01:56, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. your page looks great!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks Eran. So, I obtained permission for the IFC image from Dr. Falk in charge of the UNC Kidney Center. As for the other 2, I am happy to send you the pdfs from which they are &#039;&#039;adapted&#039;&#039;, and then we can decide whether they are unique enough for proteopedia placement? I changed them to make them unique- and I take it as a complement that you think they are journal worthy with the changes! :-)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953554</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953554"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:31:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintenance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufactures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phagocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in multiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophilic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE. &lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structures are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 is 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptible to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptible to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptible to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodies&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatible with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antigenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the antibody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessible. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines trigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangements that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The binding of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is interesting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon binding FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in eliciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflammation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Medicine and Science ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg, with permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited at the kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form. The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptible to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Falk, R. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot; UNC Kidney Center, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/iganephropathy.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crystallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these studies included x-ray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unanswered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953553</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953553"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:30:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintenance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufactures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phagocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in multiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophilic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE. &lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structures are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 is 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptible to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptible to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptible to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodies&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatible with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antigenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the antibody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessible. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines trigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangements that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The binding of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is interesting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon binding FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in eliciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflammation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Medicine and Science ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg, with permission]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited at the kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form. The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptible to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Falk, R. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot; UNC Kidney Center, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/iganephropathy.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crystallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these studies included x-ray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unanswered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953552</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953552"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:17:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Falk, R. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot; UNC Kidney Center, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/kidneyhealthlibrary/iganephropathy.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:24, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953548</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953548"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:09:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:24, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953547</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953547"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T23:07:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Implications in Science and Medicine */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology. For more information on IgA nephropathy: [http://http://www.unckidneycenter.org/contact.html].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953544</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=953544"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T22:24:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:24, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953543</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953543"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T22:23:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 01:23, 2 May 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953542</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953542"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T22:22:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcαR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcαR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcαR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcαR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the FcαR does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits FcαR clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcαR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcαR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing FcαR clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to FcαR?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953540</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953540"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T22:20:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcαR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953538</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953538"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T22:14:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953536</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953536"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:57:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953535</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953535"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:55:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953534</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953534"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:49:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953533</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953533"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:48:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Compare and Contrast */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity. Note the extended hinge region of 23 amino acids, extending IgA1&#039;s antgenic reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; planar (fab fragments aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10 amino acids in length&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Protect from proteases and increase hinge rigidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Increase hinge rigidity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; nonplanar (fab fragments not aligned with Fc portion)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Y shaped, with an intermediate length hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; increase hinge flexibility. There are no proline residues in IgG&#039;s hinge region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape. Compare with IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA1.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953532</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953532"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:39:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black) make the hinge region more flexible&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953531</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953531"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:35:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black) make the hinge region more flexible&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/3&#039;&amp;gt;2:1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The Fc portion is shown in red, and the receptor is in blue. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1_sites_covered/1&#039;&amp;gt;covered by the secretory component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Because of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/4&#039;&amp;gt;orientation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953530</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953530"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T21:22:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_y_shape/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_disulfides/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: disulfide bonds connecting the heavy and light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_glycines/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG: glycines (black) make the hinge region more flexible&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgG with hinge deletion&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (missing one fab fragment. Note the T-shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igg_mutant_no_disulfie/1&#039;&amp;gt;Lack of a disulfide bond between heavy and light chains in above IgG&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm_pentamer/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM pentamer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igm/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgM&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Igd/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgD&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Hinge region is 64 amino acids in length. Note similarity to IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;425&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of dimeric IgA1 maintains &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953529</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953529"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T20:43:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Compare and Contrast */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953528</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953528"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T20:39:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg|thumb|Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IgA_IFA.jpg|thumb|Immunofluorescence detecting IgA in IgA glomerulonephritis. From http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=File:IgA_IFA.jpg&amp;diff=953527</id>
		<title>File:IgA IFA.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=File:IgA_IFA.jpg&amp;diff=953527"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T20:36:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: Center, U. K. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot;   Retrieved 5/1, 2009, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Center, U. K. &amp;quot;IgA Nephropathy.&amp;quot;   Retrieved 5/1, 2009, from http://www.unckidneycenter.org/images/IgA_IFA.jpg.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Eran_Hodis&amp;diff=953526</id>
		<title>User talk:Eran Hodis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Eran_Hodis&amp;diff=953526"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T20:03:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==News from Greece==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
actually I was on vacation after the summer school of Erice! &lt;br /&gt;
The last days I&#039;m back in the lab and try to find the rythm of the experiments ;)&lt;br /&gt;
I shown to my boss the proteopedia and my page..he is excited! Actually I&#039;m writing a paper and I may use the proteopedia for making the pictures. I would like to ask you how can I export the pictures to my pc.&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;ll be in contact..you&#039;ll see the progress of my page!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
best wishes&lt;br /&gt;
Maria&lt;br /&gt;
---------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
Now back at home with access to my Mac. Much enjoyed meeting and talking with you. Carole and I enjoyed our round trip of Sicily, and we more or less walked our feet off in Pompei last Monday. Off to practice our golf swings now. I also talked to one of the head honchos of the Cambridge small molecule crystallographic database, and he was receptive to the idea of making a filterered subset of drugs and other biologically-active small molecules available to Proteopedia (read: ligands). If you are ever in the neighbourhood of Basel, look us up, and we can offer you a free place to sleep.&lt;br /&gt;
best regards&lt;br /&gt;
Trevor&lt;br /&gt;
---------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bad green link ==&lt;br /&gt;
Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
I have a green link which does not work, it should make a Ramachandran plot. When I attempt to edit it the SAT freezes and no other scenes can be loaded.  In fact as I remember when I first made the scene the SAT froze.  After the SAT freezes some of the links above and below this bad link no longer work.  Is there a way that a developer can delete scenes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---------&lt;br /&gt;
After I left the message for you, I decided to take a different approach and not use the link, but I would be interested in knowing what is wrong with the link if you can discover that.  I named the link plot_tripep_disallowed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PDBsum site ==&lt;br /&gt;
Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
After exploring this site I have come to the conclusion that the entry page to this site changes from time to time.  Is that correct?  If so, I should give directions on the Ramachandran page how to generate the Ramachandran plot on PDBsum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way that site is a wonderful resource.  I am going to include it in the computer resource exercise that I have my Biochemistry I students do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
I just realized that I was not thinking clearly this morning.  I had forgotten that the url that I am using is coded for 1eve and Procheck, and therefore the site will open with the desired protein and information displayed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proteopedia for teaching ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m in the middle of my labs using Proteopedia, and on balance I think it&#039;s a great improvement for this class - I run 6 streams of 60 students each in a 2nd year biochemistry class. Using sPDBv meant that they spent a lot of time struggling with the program, but proteopedia is letting them just think about the protein structure instead. So, overall positive. However, two things that have come up:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Secondary structure definitions - How does Jmol generate them? Are they user definable? Jmol is clearly using a different algorithm to sPDBv, so students are seeing inconsistency when they use both routes. (For the record, I agree with sPDBv&#039;s pick!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) More seriously, the display of backbone hydrogen bonds is wrong - not sure if this is something I&#039;m doing wrong or a fault in Jmol. Backbone hydrogen bonds are being drawn between C-alphas rather than between carbonyl oxygens and peptide nitrogens. Check out the link at the very bottom of the page http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/User:J._Shaun_Lott/BIOSCI_203 marked &amp;quot;What is wrong with this picture?&amp;quot; to see what I mean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
cheers!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shaun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What to do with my students contributions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am trying user talk to communicate instead of my email, since my question may be relevant to other educators.  I have several student contributions that I wish to keep and others that ought to be erased eventually.  I want to keep the good ones, and one bad one for illustration of a range of student abilities.  I am not sure if its best to transfer the material to my page; start another page with student contributions, or to link to the student&#039;s pages.  I have the passwords the student sites, so I can access the scripts.  What do you suggest is best?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Surfaces ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried but could not figure out if a surface of one protomer could be colored differently from a surface of another protomer using the surface representation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== more on surfaces ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surfaces are slow to load--such is life--but my experience is the same as yours.  Only one color is available for the surfaces.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
my best&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tom&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
PS.  So, what is the Israeli greetings/salutation during Hannukah?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cheers Eran! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the info. About the template text - it even appears here when I click the + tab in your talk page. I think it should be easy enough to limit the feature by namespace, as many WP extensions seem to be ns specific. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, did you ever consider installing something like &#039;liquid threads&#039; to make discussion more &#039;fully featured&#039;? I played with it on a small wiki, and it worked OK, but when you install it you loose all old discussions. For a while I wanted to merge something like PHP BB with WP to create a forum &#039;channel&#039; for each page, which should be simple enough to do... --[[User:Dan Bolser|Dan Bolser]] 10:58, 5 January 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RE: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed about the template text. I&#039;ll email/message you when we have it updated. As to liquid threads, we&#039;ve never considered anything like that, although its clear that the current MediaWiki system of messages is less than intuitive to say the least. We&#039;d be hesitant to make large changes whose stability is not guaranteed, but if you think this is something we should look into, please link me to the appropriate places where I can read more about it. Eran Hodis 13:59, 5 January 2009 (IST) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: With respect to &#039;is [this] something we should look into&#039;, I&#039;m not really sure. It depends on how much you want Proteopedia to function as a &#039;community discussion forum&#039; in addition to being a &#039;community education portal&#039;. Actually, something like &#039;technical community discussion&#039; was the emphasis of PDBWiki, which is why we think that it stands distinct from Proteopedia (with its emphasis on education). So basically I think its up to you to look at what is possible and assess the potential benefit, which may be marginal. Liquid threads is at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LiquidThreads However, as I said, I&#039;d be more interested in seeing a mini &#039;PHP BB&#039; appearing within each talk tab http://www.phpbb.com/ I don&#039;t know why there are no efforts to implement this (that I can find). Oh... I spoke to soon ;-D http://www.mediawikiusers.com/wiki/index.php/Projects:MediaWiki/phpBB_Integration but that seems a bit thin on details TBH... Anyway, I only mentioned this because you seem to have a good capacity to work on such features, and I think that such a feature would be generally useful to the wider wiki world. All the best --[[User:Dan Bolser|Dan Bolser]] 15:24, 5 January 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: After poking around I found this, http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AWC&#039;s_Forum which looks very promising. --[[User:Dan Bolser|Dan Bolser]] 16:00, 5 January 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE: Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks Eran!  We have been busier than expected at the CBM (but what else is new).  Still, we hope to continue working on Proteopedia to upload more and more images of models we have developed - as well as some working SMART Team pages.  Joel let me know that all the models made it to him intact so he should have them to show off when he gets back on your side of the world.  It is a pretty neat collection of a very interesting topic - so enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Mark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moving scenes from one page to another ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am able to copy wiki script from one page and copy it to another page using copy command: I can do ths   copy &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;scene&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;scene/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (assuming I wrote the syntax correctly) from  User:Tom Gluick/Human Glutamine Synthetase (section)  to  User:Tom Gluick/Human Glutamine Synthetase (section)/quaternary a subpage.  However, I would like to change the scene in the subpage, but when SAT is access in subpage, the scene is not found associated with the subpage.  is there something that can be done to remedy this issue.  It would certainly save me time if this were possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Media in Proteopedia?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a question about the potential for additional media on pages.  I know we can easily load and display images on Proteopedia, but is there any way to upload other file varieties - for example, simple flash animations (.swf) or something similar to that?  Or, if we can&#039;t actually upload them to the Proteopedia webspace, is there any way to have files uploaded on our own server and just displayed on the proteopedia page - perhaps by using some html similar to the &amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;www.filename.jpg&amp;quot;&amp;gt; code you can use for linking to images)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Mark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===tilman ===&lt;br /&gt;
Eran, you are right. That page &lt;br /&gt;
Http://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/User:Tilman_Schirmer/Sandbox_10&lt;br /&gt;
is obsolete. I&#039;ve saved the content to the proper Sandbox_10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can delete it. Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Tilman&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the tip Eran.  I seem to stumble across cool built in features for Proteopedia like that every time I use it!  Keep up the good work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Mark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== good enough? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you say, [[User:Ralf Stephan/Sandbox 2|this]] is good enough to replace [[2a7g]]? What more does it need for a page &#039;Thermolysin&#039;? --[[User:Ralf Stephan|Ralf Stephan]] 16:57, 7 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It&#039;s certainly enough to replace [[2a7g]], and a great start! (please do replace it) The automatically added abstract here doesn&#039;t seem to have anything to do with the structure. Is this indeed the primary publication for the structure?  Some questions/comments about your additions: Consider making &amp;quot;metalloprotease&amp;quot; as a interwiki link. We have a not-so-well developed page on [[Matrix_metalloproteinases]], but none on metalloproteases, so the reader may wonder what is a metalloprotease and what is its enzymatic function. It says &amp;quot;calcium atoms (yellow)&amp;quot; but I don&#039;t see any calcium atoms in yellow, they are green for me (as they usually are by default). It&#039;s not made entirely clear what the HEXHH motif is, could you clarify? I feel the reader would also wonder why is it important to mention in the first sentence that the protein contains zinc and several calcium atoms. Also, what is the substrate usually? The green links look just spectacular, and I&#039;m glad to see you&#039;ve quickly gotten the hang of the Scene Authoring Tools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A page called &#039;Thermolysin&#039; is a great idea, are there any other structures? We could transclude a section from your new [[2a7g]] page as well as elaborate more -- especially if there are other structures. --[[User:Eran Hodis|Eran Hodis]] 02:34, 8 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
::*There are lots of other thermolysin structures, mostly inhibitors docking and soaked with different solvent concentrations (why these?).&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just thinking that a topic page on thermolysin could use the other structures as well to present a fuller picture.&lt;br /&gt;
::*So, a topic has a set of structures, ideally of all structures, with the structures pointing to &#039;their&#039; nearest topic?&lt;br /&gt;
:::That&#039;s the current mode of thinking. Of course better ideas will be adopted.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Regarding yellow/green, that&#039;s an example of me unconsciously giving away personal genetic data ;) Really, if I have that problem, other R/G blind people would have, too, so I&#039;d suggest a different color for calcium.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm, yes we actually were wondering if that would be a problem when we made the scene links green -- is it a problem?  Unfortunately it would be quite unfeasible to change from green scene links at this point. As far as changing calcium to a color other than green -- green might be part of a big coloring scheme that we might want to stick with. We can have a discussion on this if need be. &lt;br /&gt;
::*/Wrt the paper, that paper is given by PDBsum, too, one of those where the protein is just an example in a technical presentation. I should have used a different one.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, in this case then it is probably acceptable to leave out the publication abstract. If we use a more fitting abstract, but one from authors that did not solve that structure, it might send the wrong impression to readers that the wrong set of authors solved the structure.  If you choose to do this, I would make it clear that the abstract is not the official one for this structure, and list the authors that did solve the structure with the appropriate reference.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Yes, MMPs are only a small subset of metalloproteases and should link to that WP article, too. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok good.&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks also for the other hints. Is there a list of all structure pages that have been enhanced manually? I know there&#039;s a manually maintained list as part of the topic page list but I think there should be something automatical such that enhancements are not lost. --[[User:Ralf Stephan|Ralf Stephan]] 10:16, 8 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed, but the way to do this has slipped my mind at the moment. Let&#039;s see if Jaime Prilusky knows and will respond on the mailing list. --[[User:Eran Hodis|Eran Hodis]] 12:27, 8 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== java.io.File not found ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you understand why the applet can&#039;t find the PDB file in [[Helix-turn-helix motif]]? --[[User:Ralf Stephan|Ralf Stephan]] 17:57, 8 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Never mind, I found it out myself: I forgot to provide a scene. --[[User:Ralf Stephan|Ralf Stephan]] 18:14, 8 February 2009 (IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Image Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Eran, &lt;br /&gt;
I got your message and will take care of it. I think modified images were okay. &lt;br /&gt;
Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
Leah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ditto leah. thanks! becca&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953492</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953492"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:55:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CHANGE IMAGE!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953484</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953484"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:35:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Limitations of the Current Studies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953482</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953482"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:34:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1ow0&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Fc portion of IgA bound to FcalphaR&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953481</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953481"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:31:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert 1ow0&#039;size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953480</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953480"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:29:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953479</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953479"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:27:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953478</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953478"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:26:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado, et al 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SIgA.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953473</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953473"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:23:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Bonner, et al 2009 and Bonner, et al 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusions on Function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953471</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953471"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T14:17:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Disulfide_glycos.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Functional Take Home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953461</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953461"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:57:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Functional Take Home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953460</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953460"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:55:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Functional Take Home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953458</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953458"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:54:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Insights into Function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
Adapted from Furtado PB, et al 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Functional Take Home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953456</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953456"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:48:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
:Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. So, the secretory component offers the antibody additional &#039;&#039;&#039;protection against proteolytic cleavage&#039;&#039;&#039;. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Limiting Effector Responses through Decreased FcalphaR Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively &#039;&#039;&#039;limiting the concentration of available antibody binding sites&#039;&#039;&#039; in the local environment, favoring neutralization in the absence of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses upon antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the &#039;&#039;&#039;secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory responses&#039;&#039;&#039; upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Differences in Antigen Binding&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ag_binding.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Functional Take Home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory component interacts with either dimeric IgA1 or IgA2 to form a &#039;&#039;&#039;functional unit&#039;&#039;&#039;, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Inflammation is controlled by limiting the available binding sites on the Fc portion of IgA, effectively preventing Fcalpha clustering through a 1:1 stoichiometric binding. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms fill unique niches in mucosal immune responses, suggesting selective advantages for each. Whereas IgA1 specializes in protein detection, IgA2 tends to bind LPS and polysaccharide antigen. So, structure arms the IgA secretory unit with specific advantages suited for its environmental, maintains balance between inflamation and mucosal barrier protection by limiting effector responses, and imparts unique functional roles to IgA isoforms. Together, structure and function determine the immune niches filled by IgA1 and IgA2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
:What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
:What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
:What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
:What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
:What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953448</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953448"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:19:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural COmparison */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;Insert PDB code or filename here&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Insert caption here&#039; /&amp;gt;== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural Comparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
: Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;sIgA’s Structure is Suited for the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In addition, the secretory component protects the Fc region from proteolytic cleavage. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;limiting in effector function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively decreasing the concentration of available binding sites in the local environment, favoring neutralization and non-inflammatory immune control instead of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses to antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory response upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;binding of antigen&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;functional take home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
So, the secretory component with either IgA1 or IgA2 to form a patrolling protein unit, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms to fill unique niches as important players in mucosal immune responses. Where IgA1 is able to detect predominatelty protein antigens, IgA2 is specific for LPS in addition to polysaccharides. The limited ability of IgA to induce effector responses maintains a careful balance on intitiating inflammatory states in the mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953446</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953446"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:18:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural COmparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. &amp;lt;ref name=“five” /&amp;gt;An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five” /&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
: Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;sIgA’s Structure is Suited for the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In addition, the secretory component protects the Fc region from proteolytic cleavage. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;limiting in effector function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively decreasing the concentration of available binding sites in the local environment, favoring neutralization and non-inflammatory immune control instead of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses to antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory response upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;binding of antigen&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;functional take home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
So, the secretory component with either IgA1 or IgA2 to form a patrolling protein unit, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms to fill unique niches as important players in mucosal immune responses. Where IgA1 is able to detect predominatelty protein antigens, IgA2 is specific for LPS in addition to polysaccharides. The limited ability of IgA to induce effector responses maintains a careful balance on intitiating inflammatory states in the mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953445</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953445"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T13:16:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19109255&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. While both isoforms are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Attwood, T. &amp;quot;Immunoglobulin superfamily &amp;quot; ImPrints  Retrieved April, 2009, from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/Bioinformatics/ImPRINTS/immunoglobulin_superfamily_background.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 sIgA2(nov 22 2007) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CFG&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(nov 22 2007). &amp;quot;Superfamily: immunoglobulin.&amp;quot; SCOP, from http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/data/scop.b.c.b.b.html.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandwich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;att&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural COmparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds &amp;lt;ref name=“five”/&amp;gt;. In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 18178841&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==sIgA1 and sIgA2==&lt;br /&gt;
: Binding of the secretory component to the convex edge of the Fc region of IgA1 maintains dimeric IgA1 in a near planar conformation, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The Fc regions align end to end without overlap, and the fab fragments remain in alignment with the Fc plane. In contrast, sIgA2 fab fragments remain out of alignment with the Fc plane. Because the secretory component resides at the convex region of the Fc portion, the D1 and D5 impart steric hindrance on the fab fragments, which are forced out of alignment. Consequently, IgA2 assumes a nonplanar conformation. The longer hinge region of IgA1 allows it to maintain its planar conformation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function == &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;sIgA’s Structure is Suited for the Mucosal Environment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; of the IgA, the J chain, and the secretory component lends to protection against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis.  In addition, glycosylation on the secretory chain is thought to assist with anchoring to the mucosa. Through steric hindrance, the secretory component assists in preventing the binding of microorganisms to gut mucosa, impeding their entry into the mucosa &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID: 12768205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fc portion is more susceptible to intestinal proteases than other regions of the IgA.  This region of increased susceptibility is the precise region to which the secretory component remains after the pIgR is cleaved &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In addition, the secretory component protects the Fc region from proteolytic cleavage. Binding to Fc region reduces flexibility at the hinge and between the 2 Fc regions. The loss in flexibility correlates with a decrease in the likelihood that the IgA will be in the correct conformation for cleavage to occur &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot; nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and prevents large bacterial matrix metalloproteases from cleaving the Fc and hinge regions. So, the secretory component and dimeric IgA synergize to create a protected protein fit for the harsh mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;limiting in effector function&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The FcalphaR binding sites are located one per heavy chain at each Ch2-Ch3 interface. Both both domains contribute one binding site. So, the stoichiometry between monomeric IgA and the FcalphaR is 2:1 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Dimerization would increase this stoichiometry 4:1; however, 2 of the binding sites will be covered by the secretory component. Because of orientation constraints, only 1 of the 2 remaining binding sites will be available to bind receptor. Therefore, physiologic stoichiometry is 1:1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The binding of IgA to the Fcalpha receptor does not elicit a structural change in the antibody &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;two&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Effector function is elicited when multiple receptors bind and Resultant clustering triggers signaling events. The 1:1 stoichiometry greatly limits Fcalpha clustering and consequent effector functions by effectively decreasing the concentration of available binding sites in the local environment, favoring neutralization and non-inflammatory immune control instead of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses to antigen recognition. Additional modulation occurs through internal signaling events. For example, cytokines strigger changes in cytoskeletal arrangments that result in clustering of the FcalphaR at the cell surface.  In effect, the interaction of the secretory component limits the effector and inflammatory response upon antigen binding without limiting the ability of the antibody to neutralize pathogens or exclude commensals from breeching the mucosal barrier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;binding of antigen&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
While both IgA1 and IgA2 are able to bind polysaccharide, IgA1 preferentially binds protein antigen, while IgA2 preferentially binds lipopolysaccharide lipid A &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. This difference in structure can be explained, at least in part, by structural differences. The bindng of the secretory component to IgA1 results in a planar antibody with a wide, rigid antigenic reach. In contrast, secretory component binding to IgA2 results in a compact nonplanar form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might preferentially bind repeating patterns on fixed surfaces, like bacteria coating intestinal mucosa. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling more slowly than IgA1 upon bindig FcalphaR. So, differences in isoform structure correspond to different antigen specificities and consequent differences in the roles each isoform plays in elciting mucosal immune responses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;functional take home&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
So, the secretory component with either IgA1 or IgA2 to form a patrolling protein unit, structurally adapted to the harsh mucosal environment and to control potentially pathogenic mucosal flora primarily through neutralization. Differences in structure and resulting function allows the two isoforms to fill unique niches as important players in mucosal immune responses. Where IgA1 is able to detect predominatelty protein antigens, IgA2 is specific for LPS in addition to polysaccharides. The limited ability of IgA to induce effector responses maintains a careful balance on intitiating inflammatory states in the mucosal environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis in the world and is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1, mostly in the monomeric form.The observation that individuals with IgA myeloma [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_myeloma] lack nephropathy suggests an abnormality in IgA structure, leading to an abnormal amount of polymerization. Steric hindrance of the fab segments normally limits the amount of polymerization of IgA. Bonner, et al proposes that a disturbance in the hinge region or an absence of fab. Similarly, decreased O-glycosylation might could destabilize the hinge region, allowing IgA to self associate. Likewise, destabilizing this region might make IgA susceptable to cleavage of fab fragments by bacterial proteases, leading to self aggregation and renal pathology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other areas of science, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 introduces an added variable since IgA1 is found in higher apes only &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Such complications in the experimental model must be taken into account when interpreting results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatively large amount of flexibility, it has proven particularly difficult to crystallize in its intact form. Similarly, glycosylation and long linker regions between domains poses challenges to the crysatallization of the secretory component. Alternative techniques employed in these these studies included xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and constrained modeling. Details provided in crystallographic studies – like disulfide bond, glycosylation residues and sites, detailed visualization of binding interaction – are absent in these results. Because of the limiting resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, numerous questions are left unanswered, some of which are listed below. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered (a few of many)==&lt;br /&gt;
What secretory component amino acids interact with the J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
What CDR-like motifs of secretory component’s D1 bind, and where does this binding occur on IgA? &lt;br /&gt;
What residues on the secretory component are glycosylated? &lt;br /&gt;
What binding differences characterize IgA1 vs IgA2? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
What are the precise binding motifs of the secretory component and IgA1? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What is the structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy? &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;eight&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Influenza virus hemagglutinin complexed with a neutralizing antibody [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953408</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=953408"/>
		<updated>2009-05-01T02:38:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgR). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: a Structural COmparison ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The hinge region differs significantly between the two IgA isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;T-shape&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The unique characteristics of IgA1 and IgA2 explain the antibodys&#039; overall T-shape. :IgA distinctly lacks the classic &amp;quot;Y-shape&amp;quot; antibody structure. IgA&#039;s increased hinge rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s Y-shape. While the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape. Of note, the T-shaped IgA2, with its interchain disulfide bond, resembles the structure of an IgG lacking the disulfide bonds between the heavy and light chains, which suggests the possibility of an evolutionary relationship between the two. The presence of IgA2 in lower mammals in contrast to IgA1 also supports this hypothesis.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J Chain allows IgA to form Dimers==&lt;br /&gt;
:The IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, 137-residue polypeptide chain is comprised of 2 immunoglobulin-like domains. The J chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on IgA&#039;s Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers. These polymers are rare because steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions makes polymerization thermodynamically unfavorable 18178841. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:When IgA forms dimers, the Fc regions align end to end without overlap 18178841. The J chain lies within a fold in the bent Fc region. This conformation may allow the J chain access to the Secretory Component of the pIgR, which allows translocation across the mucosal epithelia to the luminal surface. Of note, in the image the J chains the J chains are extending from the dimer, which does not match with the described interaction of the J chain with the Fc portions of the anitbody (see Limitations of the Current Studies).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Secretory Component==&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA is secreted as a dimer when it binds to the pIgR and is transported across the cell membrane 10064707 Upon IgA binding, the receptor-antibody complex is transocytosed to the lumenal side, where native proteases cleave the pIgR, releasing the secretory IgA (sIgA) into the lumen 10064707. The region of the pIgR that remains attached to the IgA upon pIgR cleavage is known as the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretory compenent is the first 585 residues of the pIgR 17428798. The C terminal end of the secretory component is linked to the pIgR, but maintains no specific fold. The ability for the secretory to move freely facilitates its proteolytic cleavage and the secretion of sIgA. Structurally, the secretory component is comprised of 5 V-type immunoglobulin-like domains (D1-5) with 5-7 glycan chains, which increase the chains resistance to proteases. These glycosylation sites are located on one side of the protein and do not interfere with IgA binding. A long (10 amino acids) linker region exists between D3 and D4, so the D4 and D5 regions fold in on D2 and D3 in a compact J-shape. D1-3 are 12nm in length, while D4-5 are 10 nm long. Thus, D1 remains accessable. The one-sided glycans allow free access of D1&#039;s CDR regions and the Cys 502 at D5 to interact with IgA. It is thought that when D1 interacts with IgA&#039;s Fc region and the J chain,  allowing the secretory component to unfold and disulfide formation between D5 C502 and IgA&#039;s Ch2 C311. While SC unfolds upon IgA binding, this binding imparts no change on the structure of IgA 19079336. Furthermore, the secretory component&#039;s binding site on IgA, interacting with the DE and FG loops affects the biding of IgA to its receptor FcalphaR, which interacts with the FG loops.  12768205 Fcalpha R, FG loops = major binding site for Fc 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
C311 only 10 angstroms away 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==synergy SC == mutual mucosal activity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== changes in effector function ==&lt;br /&gt;
SIgA  steric hindrance, no binding to mucosal surface 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
SIgA cannot activate Fcalpha R, FG loops = major binding site for Fc 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
C311 only 10 angstroms away 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
 no binding to Fcalpha/ no activation w/o integrin 12768205&lt;br /&gt;
SC delays cleavage at Fc and hinge region, decreased access 2/2 fab and binding to cell surface R (bacterial proteases are alrge)  19079336 &lt;br /&gt;
2 FcalphaRI binding sites, one per heavy chain, at each Ch2-Ch3 interface – both domains contribute 2:1 stoichiometry 15111057 &lt;br /&gt;
Funct: helps prevent entry of pathogens/ gut flora into mucosa 10064707&lt;br /&gt;
SC steric hindrance  pathogens cannot bind to mucosal surface 12768205 &lt;br /&gt;
Function binding to IgA = protection against proteolytic degradation 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Glycan residues do not impact binding aff to Iga, but instead assist with anchoring of the sIgA at the mucosal surface &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fc iga = more susc to intestinal proteases, precisely region pIg binds to and SC remains in assoc w Fc portion, w/o affecting function or motility of Fab or hinge region 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Binding to Fc  reduce flexibility @ hinge and btwn 2 Fc regions  less lilkely to be in correct conformation for cleavage to occur 19079336 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
Glycosylation + linking regions btwn domains- longer = less likely to be crystallized 17428798 SC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: INFLUENZA VIRUS HEMAGGLUTININ COMPLEXED WITH A NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950823</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950823"/>
		<updated>2009-04-24T17:59:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: INFLUENZA VIRUS HEMAGGLUTININ COMPLEXED WITH A NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY [[1QFU]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950766</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950766"/>
		<updated>2009-04-24T03:44:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Compare and Contrast */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;200&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950765</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950765"/>
		<updated>2009-04-24T03:22:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Crystal structure of the intact human IgG B12 with broad and potent activity against primary HIV-1 isolates: a template for HIV vaccine design [[1hzh]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG: Three=dimensional structure of a human immunoglobulin with a hinge deletion [[1mco]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE: Structure of the human ige-fc bound to its high affinity receptor fc(epsilon)ri(alpha) [[1f6a]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=950736</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=950736"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T17:22:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{STRUCTURE_1iga |  PDB=1iga  |  SCENE=   }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refernces not yet complete!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 19:51, 23 April 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=950733</id>
		<title>IgA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=IgA&amp;diff=950733"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T16:51:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: New page: {{STRUCTURE_1iga |  PDB=1iga  |  SCENE=   }}  == Introduction to IgA == The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of ou...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{STRUCTURE_1iga |  PDB=1iga  |  SCENE=   }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refernces not yet complete!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rebecca Martin|Rebecca Martin]] 19:51, 23 April 2009 (IDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950732</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950732"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T16:48:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: /* Limitations of the Current Studies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950731</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950731"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T16:47:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
Of note, studying mouse models of pathologies involving IgA1 may lack accuracy since IgA1 is found in higher apes only.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
: The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950729</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950729"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T16:42:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy suggest an abnormality in IgA structure. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric. Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions polymers rare). Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow  cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
: The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions Unasnwered==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950728</id>
		<title>Rebecca Martin/Sandbox1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1&amp;diff=950728"/>
		<updated>2009-04-23T16:38:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rebecca Martin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction to IgA ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most extensive surface in contact with the external environment is not our skin, but the epithelial lining of our gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urogenital tracts &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;seven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:17428798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As a first line of defense in maintainance the integrity our mucosa, the immune system manufatures and secretes dimeric IgA to neutralize pathogenic organisms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:15111057&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and exclude the entry of commensals at the mucosal border &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:19079336&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the serum, IgA functions as a second line of defense against pathogens that may breech the epithelial boundary &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The body produces more IgA than any other antibody isotype  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. In fact, IgA is the most abundant antibody in the body, further illustrating IgA&#039;s critical role in immunity &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot;&amp;gt;PMID:10064707&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least two isotypes exist, termed IgA1 and IgA2. IgA2 can further be categorized into 2 allotypes: IgA2 m(1) and IgA2 m(2). While IgA2 is found in most mammalian species, IgA1 is found only in higher apes. An approximately equal ratio of secretory IgA1 (sIgA1) to secretory IgA2 (sIgA2) reside at the mucosal surface, with the exception of the colon, where the majority is sIgA2 &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In the serum, about 90% of the IgA is monomeric IgA1 &amp;lt;ref name =&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The receptors for IgA include the Fcα Receptor (FcαRI; CD89) and the polyimmunologlobulin receptor (pIgRI). When binding to FcαRI results in the dimerization, the consequent signaling results in effector functions, including respiratory burst, mucosal surface, phaocytosis, and eosinophil degranulation. Binding to the pIgR results in transoocytosis and IgA secretion &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Unlike other antibody isotypes, IgA exists in mutiple oligomeric states &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nineseven&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The most common of which are the monomeric, dimeric, and secretory forms &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ten&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, adding to the complexity of structural functions for IgA. Exploring IgA&#039;s structure and protein interactions illuminates the unique and critical function IgA plays in humoral immunity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antibody Structure and the Immunoglobulin Domain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Forms of IgA&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:An antibody is a tetramer of &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_light_chains/2&#039;&amp;gt;2 light chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;  and &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_heavy_chains/1&#039;&amp;gt;2 heavy chains&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. In other words, the antibody is a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_no_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;homodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of 2 heterodimers. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_homodimer/1&#039;&amp;gt;heterodimer&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is comprised on one light chain and one heavy chain. Heavy and light chains are held together with disulfide bonds and noncovalent interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fab and Fc fragments&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:Another common way of describing antibody structure is in terms of its Fab and Fc fragments. Each light chains are composed of 2 immunoglobulin domains: one variable domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and one constant domain. Heavy chains composed of 4 Ig domains: one V-type and 3 C-type, named CH1 - CH3. A linking hinge region separates the CH2 and CH3 domains. Proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region by the protease papain, or a similar protease, yields 2 Fab fragments and 1 Fc fragment. Each &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fab_ex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fab fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contains 2 variable domains, one from the heavy chain and one from the light chain, and 2 constant domains one from the light chain and the Ch1 domain from the heavy chain. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Fc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Fc fragment&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; Fc fragment contains 4 constant domains: the Ch2 and Ch3 domains from each of the heavy chains. Since the variable portions determine antigen specificity, the Fab fragments are generally thought of as the antigen-binding portion. The Fc fragment is important in binding various receptors, many of which are isotype specific and are named after the isotype of the ligand, i.e. FcαR binds the Fc portion of IgA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Immunoglobulin domains&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:The antibody is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of proteins (ref Att). Each chain can be further broken down into immunoglobulin domains: 2 in the light chain and 4 in the heavy chain, for a total of 12 in the entire antibody. Each immunoglobulin domain contains a primary amino acid sequence of approximately 70 – 100 residues long. Secondary structure is a characteristic beta sandwich with a variable number of beta strands, depending on the unit type. These strands display Greek key connectivity (web other) and form 2 beta sheets that fold over each other. An intra-domain disulfide bond stabilizes the tertiary structure. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_variable_domain/1&#039;&amp;gt;Variable type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Nine antiparrallel beta strands comprise variable or V-regions. Loop sequences of varying length connect the strands. The 9 strands form 2 beta sheets, one with 4 (ABED-prosite) strands and the other with 3 (CFG prosite). The remaining 2 strands (C’ and C”) lie in between the 2 sheets. A disulfide bride stabilizes the 2 sandwich halves. Hydrophobic residues face the interior of the sheet, providing stability, while hydrophillic residues face outward and interact with the local environment. The extra loops in the V-region are critical for epitope specificity, and are consequently known as the compliment determining regions, here shown on the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Cdr_360_view/2&#039;&amp;gt;Fab molecule&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_constant_domain_light/1&#039;&amp;gt;Classic type domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::C-type domains lack the C&#039; and C&#039;&#039; beta strands. The sheets are ABED and CFG. Consequently, the sandich is more tightly packed. In the antibody, the constant domains determine the isotype: IgA, IgD, IgM, IgG, or IgE.&lt;br /&gt;
:Related structures&lt;br /&gt;
::Proteins containing the classic immunoglobulin-like domain are found predominantly in the immune system. In fact, the antibody&#039;s closest related structires are those that recognize antigen: MHC and TCRs.&lt;br /&gt;
::The V-type domain is found in a wider variety of proteins, including the Ig-binding molecules, such as the pIgR and the FcalphaR. &lt;br /&gt;
::Viral hemagluttinin is yet another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The J chain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;2qtj&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=dimeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; In addition to the homodimer of light and heavy chains, IgA structure has an addition 18 kDa, 137 residue polypeptide chain called the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/2&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; 10064707. This 18 kDa, immunoglobulin-like  137 residue polypeptide chain is covalently attached to the C terminal Cys471 on the Ch3 domain 18178841 via a disulfide bridge with either the J chain’s Cys 14 or the Cys 68. 10064707, 18178841 . The J chain has a single N-linked oligosaccharide 15111057, which increases rigidity and offers protection against proteases. The J chain allows IgA to form &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_dimeric/1&#039;&amp;gt;dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; dimers, and less often trimer and tetramers, although these polymers are rare secondary steric hindrance from the T-shaped Fab regions 18178841. Note that hypothesized structure does not match the image, as the J chains are extending from the dimer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IgA1 and IgA2: Differences in Structure ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Hinge Region&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IgA2 can further be categorized into two or more allotypes. The hinge region differs significantly between the two isoforms. The hinge region of IgA1 is comprised of 23 residues (PVPSTPPTPSPSTPPTPSPSCCH) and 5 O-glycosylation sites, while IgA2’s hinge region is comprised of 10 residues (PVPPPPPCCH) and no sites of glycosylation. Both hinge regions are located at Cys220 on the Ch1 chain and end at Ch2’s Pro244; however, the naming system is misleading, as it follows IgA1 and is therefore misleading. In fact, the distance from the the center of the 2 Fab fragments in IgA1 ia 16.9nm versus 8.2 nm in IgA2. So, while IgA1 remains extended, IgA2 is more compact. The greater number of residues in the IgA1 hinge region corresponds to a &#039;&#039;&#039;greater antigenic reach&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;five&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:These data must be taken into account with other hinge region characteristics. IgA1’s hinge region contains 5 sites of O-glycosylation, while IgA2’s hinge region contains none. In addition, IgA1’s hinge region contains 10 Pro residues, while IgA2’s region contains 6.  In comparison, IgG’s hinge region contains No glycine residues reside in the hinge regions of either IgA1 or IgA2. The presence of prolines, the absence of glycine and the presence of glycosylated residues in IgA1 all amount to &#039;&#039;&#039;increased hinge rigidity&#039;&#039;&#039; in comparison to IgG1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;N-glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:In the harsh mucosal environment, glycosylated residues protect the protein from proteases. Both IgA1 and IgA2 display N-glycosylated residues. IgA1 has 3, at N263 on beta strand B on the Ch2 chain and on the J tail at N459. In IgA2, additional sites of N-glycosylation include Asn166 on the beta strand G of Ch1 and Asn337 of beta strand G on Ch2. Some alloforms of IgA2 are also N-glycosylated at Asn211 on Ch2. 15111057 An increased need for protection against proteolytic cleavage at the hinge region accounts for the presence of O-glycosylation in IgA1’s hinge region, particularly cleavage by bacterial metalloproteases. The glycosylation residues provide increased steric hindrance, and creating difficulty in fitting the peptide in the protease’s active site. In comparison to IgG, which is only 2.9% (w/w) glycosylated, IgA1 is 9.5% (w/w) and IgA2 is 11% (w/w) glycosylated. Overall, IgA1 is more susceptable to proteases than IgA2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disulfide Bonds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:The two structures also differ in the locations of their disulfide bonds 15111057 . In IgA1, a disulfide bond exists between the heavy chain Cys220 and light chain Cys196. This disulfide bond is absent in the main form of IgA2. Instead a disulfide bond links the 2 light chains at their C termini. The heavy and light chain associate through noncovalent interactions. So, while IgA1 may be more susceptable to proteases, IgA2 is more susceptable to denaturing conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased rigidity and a longer hinge region result in IgA1&#039;s predominately T-shape, in comparison to IgG&#039;s classic Y-shape. In addition, while the structure of IgA2 is more compact, the combination of an inter-light chain disulfide bond, a short hinge region, and proline residues with the hinge provide steric forces compatable with a T-shape.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compare and Contrast ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1iga&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA1&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_overview/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_ser_thr/1&#039;&amp;gt;Potential Sites of O-linked Glycosylation (5 residues per hinge glycosylated)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Prolines&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_n_glycos/2&#039;&amp;gt;N-glycosylated residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga1_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1def/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA1&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;applet load=&#039;1r70&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;monomeric IgA2&#039; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_spin/1&#039;&amp;gt;IgA2&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge length&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_length/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge glycosylation&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_hinge_proline/1&#039;&amp;gt;Hinge Proline&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Iga2_j_chain/1&#039;&amp;gt;J chain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Siga1/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory IgA2 (nonplanar, steric interacitons between SC&#039;d D1 and D5 domains and the Fab fragments)&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Rebecca_Martin/Sandbox1/Sc/1&#039;&amp;gt;Secretory Component&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insights into Function ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Glycosylation&#039;&#039;&#039; lends to protectiona against proteolytic attack in the harsh mucosal environment. &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Dimerization&#039;&#039;&#039; allows transcytosis and interferes with Fc receptor binding 4:1 --&amp;gt; 2:1 and then CS --&amp;gt; 1:1. COnsequently, it would be more difficult to elicit an immune response in the mucosa. Furthermore, unwanted inflammatory reactions to commensals would be more easilly avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Secretory Component&#039;&#039;&#039; results in unigue structure with IgA1 versus IgA2, acting in synergy and partaking in the antibody&#039;s antigen specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
Since IgA1 is planar and more flexible, this might lend to &#039;&#039;&#039;antigen binding&#039;&#039;&#039; on proteins, which are larger and more variable. Flexibility allows IgA1 access to a more diverse array of orientations. Likewise the more compact, nonplanar IgA2 might. It is intersting to note that IgA2 tends to induce signaling at the Fca recetor. &lt;br /&gt;
These &#039;&#039;&#039;synergistic relationships&#039;&#039;&#039; between structure and inter molecular interaciton suggest substantial &#039;&#039;&#039;coevolution&#039;&#039;&#039; between these molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications in Science and Medicine ==&lt;br /&gt;
Proposed mechanism for IgA nephropathy:&lt;br /&gt;
IgA nephropathy is the most prebvalent cause of chronic glomerulonephritis. This disease is caused by polymeric IgA1 deposited @ kidney glomeruli 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Lack of the nepropathy in ppl w IgA myeloma w/o nephropathy  abnormal IgA. Notably, 90% of serum IgA is IgA1 and is monomeric.&lt;br /&gt;
Propose disturbance in hinge region/ absence of fab (Steric hindrance of T-shaped fab regions  polymers rare)&lt;br /&gt;
Decreased O-glycosylation has been proposed as a mechanism- may destabilize hinge region, allow IgA to self associate or allow &lt;br /&gt;
cleavage of hinge region by bacterial proteases&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion: near-planar characteristic lends IgA1 to pathology 2/2 formation multimers following disruption of fab fragments from their natural rigid form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations of the Current Studies ==&lt;br /&gt;
: The techniques used in the majoroty of these studies were xray, neutron scattering analysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and  constrained modeling. Why didn&#039;t they just crystallize? Because IgA has a high amount of glycosylation and a relatiely large amount of flexibility, it has proven partivcularly difficult to crystalize in its intact form. 18178841, 10064707, 15111057  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions for the Future ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the limitating resolution of these models, many details concerning the binding residues and residue interactions are left unknown. &lt;br /&gt;
SC aa interact w J chain? &lt;br /&gt;
CDR-like motifs of SC&#039;s D1 bind where on @ IgA?; &lt;br /&gt;
Locations of oligos on SC? &lt;br /&gt;
Differences in binding IgA1 vs IgA2 17428798 &lt;br /&gt;
Why does IgA2 lack as robust an effector function in binding to Fcalpha?&lt;br /&gt;
Precise binding motifs SC and IgA1 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Structure of IgA involved in IgA nephropathy 18178841 &lt;br /&gt;
Crystallographic structure will yield further insights into the structure of IgA, the interactions between IgA and other molecules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== IgA ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fab and Fc Fragments&lt;br /&gt;
:: Refined crystal structure of the galactan-binding immunoglobulin fab j539 at 1.95-angstroms resolution [[2fbj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 2.7 angstroms [[1mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin fab mc/pc603. an x-ray diffraction study at 3.1 angstroms [[2mcp]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI bound to IgA1-Fc [[1ow0]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Refined crystal structure of a recombinant immunoglobulin domain and a complementarity-determining region 1-grafted mutant [[2imm]] and[[2imn]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein (SSL7) in complex with Fc of human IgA1 [[2qej]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Monomeric&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA1 determined by solution scattering, curve-fitting, and homology modeling [[1iga]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Model of human IgA2 determined by solution scattering, curve fitting and homology modelling [[1r70]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimeric and Secretory&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human dimeric immunoglobulin A [[2qtj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory IgA1 [[3chn]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution Structure of Human SIgA2 [[3cm9]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: Solution structure of human secretory component [[2ocw]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related Molecules ===&lt;br /&gt;
* non-IgA antibody isotypes&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgM: Solution structure of human Immunoglobulin M [[2rcj]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgG:&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgD: Semi-extended solution structure of human myeloma immunoglobulin D determined by constrained X-ray scattering [[1zvo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: IgE:&lt;br /&gt;
* Other C-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: MHC: Crystal Structure of monomeric human beta-2-microglobulin [[1lds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: TCR: Crystal Structure of the G17E/A52V/S54N/Q72H/E80V/L81S/T87S/G96V variant of the murine T cell receptor V beta 8.2 domain [[2apv]]&lt;br /&gt;
* V-type immunoglobulin examples&lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal Structure of a Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Polymeric Ig Receptor, pIgR [[1XED]] &lt;br /&gt;
:: Crystal structure of human FcaRI [[10vz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rebecca Martin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>