
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://proteopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Remo+Rohs</id>
	<title>Proteopedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://proteopedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Remo+Rohs"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/Special:Contributions/Remo_Rohs"/>
	<updated>2026-09-16T17:16:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1417762</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1417762"/>
		<updated>2012-07-12T00:34:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Kessler N, Rabinovich D, Shaulov L, Haran TE, Shakked Z. Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. Mol Cell. 2006 Jun 23;22(6):741-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16793544 PMID:16793544].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horvath MM, Wang X, Resnick MA, Bell DA. Divergent evolution of human p53 binding sites: cell cycle versus apoptosis. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul;3(7):e127. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17677004 PMID:17677004].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Advice and technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415798</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415798"/>
		<updated>2012-07-09T22:41:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horvath MM, Wang X, Resnick MA, Bell DA. Divergent evolution of human p53 binding sites: cell cycle versus apoptosis. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul;3(7):e127. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17677004 PMID:17677004].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Advice and technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415797</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415797"/>
		<updated>2012-07-09T22:40:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horvath MM, Wang X, Resnick MA, Bell DA. Divergent evolution of human p53 binding sites: cell cycle versus apoptosis. PLoS Genet. 2007 Jul;3(7):e127. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17677004 PMID:17677004].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Advice and technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415698</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415698"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:46:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:63-101. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651302 PMID:19651302]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS. The specificity of homeotic gene function. Bioessays. 1995 Oct;17(10):855-63. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7487967 PMID:7487967].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Advice and technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415697</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415697"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:44:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Advice and technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415696</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415696"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:42:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415695</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415695"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:39:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21270796 PMID:21270796].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415694</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415694"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:37:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159469 PMID:20159469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415693</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415693"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:35:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12466549 PMID:12466549].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415692</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415692"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:32:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7878469 PMID:7878469].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415691</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415691"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:30:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364130 PMID:20364130].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415690</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415690"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:25:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415689</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415689"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:24:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;400&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Cañada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415688</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415688"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:20:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:63-101. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651302 PMID:19651302]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS. The specificity of homeotic gene function. Bioessays. 1995 Oct;17(10):855-63. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7487967 PMID:7487967].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415687</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415687"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:18:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:63-101. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651302 PMID:19651302]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS. The specificity of homeotic gene function. Bioessays. 1995 Oct;17(10):855-63. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7487967 PMID:7487967].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415686</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415686"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:14:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;88:63-101. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651302 PMID:19651302]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415685</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415685"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:07:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19865164 PMID:19865164]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415684</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415684"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:06:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415683</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415683"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:05:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334529 PMID:20334529]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415682</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415682"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T06:02:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17981120 PMID:17981120]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415681</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415681"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T05:59:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=PMID%3A%2022153072 PMID:22153072]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415653</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1415653"/>
		<updated>2012-07-07T19:25:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: /* Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. In &#039;&#039;Drosophila,&#039;&#039; eight Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, such as its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows that the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of cofactors, Extradenticle (Exd)/Pbx proteins. Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their binding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039;, for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimers with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;410&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple for conserved residues vs. cyan for variable residues).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provide the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanism was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/2r5y PDB ID# 2R5Y].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site, whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. The biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent in in-vivo experiments. Upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine, Scr expression in a fly embryo is dramatically affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in &lt;br /&gt;
the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of a Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shapes of both sites are distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Cañada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Cañada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Columbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415643</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415643"/>
		<updated>2012-07-07T19:05:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: /* Domain Architecture and Tetramerization */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is crucial in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell. This activation unleashes the function of p53 as a transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD),based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focusing on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, [http://proteopedia.com/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID 3KZ8.]&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case, the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. The iodide ions shown in the structure (magenta) are included due to crystallization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove. Among which, the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is very important biologically because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for human p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415625</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415625"/>
		<updated>2012-07-07T18:08:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415624</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1415624"/>
		<updated>2012-07-07T18:04:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: /* Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Cañada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Consensus Site=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as functions of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [[3kmd|PDB ID# 3KMD]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413837</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413837"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:41:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential (Figure 7)&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413836</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413836"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:40:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413835</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413835"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:39:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer interface with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413834</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413834"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:37:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413833</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413833"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:36:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. Eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, for example its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows for the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of a cofactor, Extradenticle (Exd). Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their biniding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimer with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; PDB ID# 2R5Z.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins and their cofactors belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) are homeodomain proteins. The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple vs. cyan).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provides the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanisms was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; PDB ID# 2R5Y.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. In vivo experiments, the biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent as upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine expression in a fly embryo is affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shape of both sites is distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Canada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented on this page has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Coilumbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413832</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413832"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:35:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. Eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, for example its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows for the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of a cofactor, Extradenticle (Exd). Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their biniding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimer with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; PDB ID# 2R5Z.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins and their cofactors belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) are homeodomain proteins. The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple vs. cyan).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provides the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanisms was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; PDB ID# 2R5Y.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. In vivo experiments, the biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent as upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine expression in a fly embryo is affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shape of both sites is distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Canada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, and Bussemaker labs at Coilumbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413831</id>
		<title>Hox protein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=Hox_protein&amp;diff=1413831"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:35:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Hox Proteins Recognize the Sequence-Dependent Shape of the Minor Groove=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of Hox Proteins==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hox-intro.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2r5z PDB ID# 2R5Z]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, Crickmore MA, Jacob V, Aggarwal AK, Honig B, Mann RS. Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell. 2007;131(3):530-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Hox protein Scr (yellow) and its cofactor Exd (blue) bind to its specific &#039;&#039;fkh20&#039;&#039; site.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 2: Hox proteins require a cofactor to achieve high binding specificity in order to execute their distinct functions in developing various parts of the fly embryo &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, Dror I, Zhou T, Rohs R, Honig B, Bussemaker HJ, Mann RS. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell. 2011;147(6):1270-82.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are transcription factors that play a key role in the &#039;&#039;&#039;embryonic development&#039;&#039;&#039; across species by activating and repressing genes. Eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins are responsible for the development of different body segments of the fly, for example its antennae, wings, or legs. Hox proteins execute their distinct functions through binding to similar but different in vivo binding sites. This page discusses molecular mechanisms through which Hox proteins recognize their DNA targets with very high binding specificity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystal structure of a Hox-DNA complex (Figure 1) shows for the Hox protein Sex combs reduced (Scr) that it binds its specific in vivo site with the help of a cofactor, Extradenticle (Exd). Hox proteins can bind DNA as monomers but their biniding specificity is enhanced when the co-factor is present, a principle that is called &#039;&#039;&#039;latent specificity&#039;&#039;&#039; (Figure 2). In &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; for instance, eight Hox proteins bind as heterodimer with their cofactor Exd to similar but distinct target sites.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins are expressed along the anterior-posterior axis of an embryo, thus determining the localization for the development of different body segments (Figure 2). This spatial order of expression from anterior to posterior is congruent with the location of the respective Hox genes at the chromosome, a fact known as &#039;&#039;&#039;collinearity&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox mutants can lead to malformations, and studying the molecular basis of how Hox proteins execute distinct in vivo functions, therefore, remains an important field of biomedical research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of Hox-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5z&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 3: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Scr specific site; PDB ID# 2R5Z.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homeodomain Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins and their cofactors belong to the family of homeodomain proteins, which are encoded by homeoboxes. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/1&#039;&amp;gt;Homeodomains are helix-turn-helix motifs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; comprised of three alpha helices (Figure 3). Both Scr (yellow) and Exd (blue) are homeodomain proteins. The interface residues of both proteins are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Complex/2&#039;&amp;gt; evolutionary most conserved&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; (dark purple vs. cyan).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their third alpha helix of the Scr and Exd homeodomains, the so-called &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_recognition_helix/3&#039;&amp;gt;recognition helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, inserts into the major groove where hydrogen bonds are formed between protein side chains and base pairs. An N-terminal tail forms contacts with the minor groove.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hox Protein-Cofactor Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scr interacts with its cofactor Exd through hydrophobic interactions via a &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_ypwm_motif/4&#039;&amp;gt;YPWM motif&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; located at its N-terminal tail. This interaction spans Scr&#039;s flexible N-terminal linker across the minor groove of its binding site. In the absence of the YPWM motif, Scr and Exd would not form a heterodimer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hox proteins achieve a large fraction of their binding specificity through &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;hydrogen bonds between residues of the recognition helix and base pairs in the major groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. This form of protein-DNA recognition in the major groove is characterized as &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; since hydrogen bonds in the major groove can be used to distinguish between all four possible base pairs, A/T, T/A, C/G, and G/C. The Scr residues that engage in major groove base readout are &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/6&#039;&amp;gt;Ile47, Gln50, Asn51, and Met54&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Major groove contacts are almost identical across the Hox protein family and are not sufficient to achieve specificity within this family of transcription factors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minor groove contacts, in addition to base readout in the major groove, provides the level of specificity that contributes to distinguishing factors within the Hox family. It has been shown that minor groove contacts are essential for achieving specificity. Three side chains, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Scr_mg/8&#039;&amp;gt;His-12, Arg3, and Arg5 are observed to contact the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; of the Scr in vivo site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039;. However, this additional level of binding specificity is not achieved through hydrogen bonds between protein side chains and functional groups of the bases. Such direct interactions are unable to distinguish A/T and T/A, or C/G and G/C base pairs due to the overlapping location of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mechanism through which these three residues recognize the DNA minor groove is called &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; as they do not form base-specific hydrogen bonds but rather recognize the sequence-specific narrowing of the minor groove. AT-rich regions can be characterized through an intrinsically narrow minor groove, leading to enhanced negative electrostatic potential, which in turn attracts basic side chains. This shape readout mechanisms was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological Function of Minor Groove Binding Residues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Joshi-etal-Figure7.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 4: Expression patterns of Scr in presence of Scr specific site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;2r5y&#039; size=&#039;300&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: 3D-Representation of Exd-Scr-DNA ternary complex with Hox consensus site; PDB ID# 2R5Y.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/3&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In vitro binding studies have shown that His-12 and Arg3 mutations have a large effect when exposed to the Scr specific site whereas the effect is small when exposed to a Hox consensus site. In vivo experiments, the biological importance of both side chains becomes apparent as upon mutations of His-12 and Arg3 to alanine expression in a fly embryo is affected (Figure 4). In comparison to  wild type Scr (A) and based on ectopic expression (B), there is only residual expression detected in the thorax region of the double mutant when the Scr specific site is tested (C), whereas there is no apparent effect on expression in the presence of a Hox consensus site (D-F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recognition of Scr Specific vs. Hox Consensus Site==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This observation can be explained based on a second crystal structure of an Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complex where the Hox-Exd hetrodimer is bound to a Hox consensus site, which is not specific to Scr. In this structure it is apparent that only &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_169/Con/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg5 binds the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and the remainder of the N-terminal linker is disordered (Figure 5).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cell2007-Fig4.jpg‎ |thumb|left|300px|Figure 6: Comparison of DNA shape of Scr specific in vivo site (left panel) vs. Hox consensus site (right panel). Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;joshi&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the comparison of the two crystal structures of Scr-Exd-DNA ternary complexes (Figure 6), it was found that three N-terminal residues contact the minor groove of the Scr specific site &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (A) compared to only Arg5 binding the Hox consensus site &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (B). In their protein-bound states, the shape of both sites is distinct (dark gray, concave; green, convex surfaces). The distinct shapes of the two DNA binding sites, shown as minor groove width in the crystal structures of the complexes (blue plots), are already present when the protein is not bound to the DNA, with two minima in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (C) vs. one minimum in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (D), as inferred by Monte Carlo simulations (green plots). Minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots) correlate and form two binding pockets in &#039;&#039;fkh250&#039;&#039; (E) and only a binding site for Arg5 in &#039;&#039;fkh250con&#039;&#039; (F).&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==High-throughput Analysis of Hox-DNA Binding Specificity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Slattery-etal-Figure6.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Figure 7:  DNA shape analysis of &amp;gt;650,000 sites derived from SELEX-seq experiments. Elsevier/Cell Press has provided permission for usage of this figure&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slattery&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on SELEX-seq data and a method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape, the same pattern of two minima in minor groove width (A) was predicted for the binding sites of all anterior Hox proteins vs. a single minimum (A) for all posterior Hox proteins (dark green for narrow groove, white for wide groove). Frames highlight the regions that correspond to the minima in Figure 6. Differences in minor groove width between binding sites can be visualized in a Euclidean distance dendrogram, which forms two branches representing anterior and posterior Hox proteins (B). The differences between both groups are significant as shown by Pearson correlation (C). Remarkably, using DNA shape of their selected binding sites the eight &#039;&#039;Drosophila&#039;&#039; Hox proteins order according to their collinearity. This result, thus, indicates how Hox genes have likely differentiated throughout evolution.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Iris Dror and Ana Carolina Dantas Machado and La Canada High School students xxx. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Mann, Honig, Bussemaker labs at Coilumbia University, the Aggarwal lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and the Rohs Lab at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413830</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413830"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:33:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. and the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413829</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413829"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:05:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413828</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413828"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:04:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=File:Consensus.jpg&amp;diff=1413827</id>
		<title>File:Consensus.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=File:Consensus.jpg&amp;diff=1413827"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:04:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: p53 consensus site&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
p53 consensus site&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PD-self}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413826</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413826"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T03:00:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant in p53-DNA complexes indicates a sequence-speific feature of the response element either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413825</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413825"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:58:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine base compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413824</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413824"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:55:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273, contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance of Arg248 for p53-DNA binding and its role in cancer. The described mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413823</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413823"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:44:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements are the most conserved positions in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413822</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413822"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:43:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response of p53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding. Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413821</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413821"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:19:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base Pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413820</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413820"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:18:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, depicted here for the identical base pair in a p53 response element with different sequence from [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3KMD PDB ID# 3KMD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wolberger&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;chen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hashimi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413819</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413819"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:15:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413818</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413818"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for p53-DNA recognition, Hoogsteen base pairs are not present in the complex with a different DNA sequence &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chen Y, Dey R, Chen L. Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. Structure. 2010;18(2):246-56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the DNA undergoes a different deformation not observed in the complex with Hoogsteen base pairing. Since transient Hoogsteen base pairs have been detected in naked DNA with preferences for CA and TA dincucleotides&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O&#039;Brien PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature. 2011;470(7335):498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the observation of the base pairing variant indicates a sequence-speific feature either recognized or stabilized by p53. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413817</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413817"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T02:02:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick base pairing geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogsteen base pairs have previously been found in protein-DNA complexes but usually associated with drastic deformations of the DNA. Only in one case of a homeodomain protein, a Hoogsteen base pair was identified in undistorted B-DNA &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Aishima J, Gitti RK, Noah JE, Gan HH, Schlick T, Wolberger C. A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5244-52..&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413816</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413816"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T01:58:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (green) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;decrease the diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for this deformation of the double helix is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;base pairing geometry in Hoogsteen base pairs&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with the approximately 180 degree rotation of adenine around the glycosidic bond and formation of hydrogen bonds with thymine at a different edge of the adenine compared to &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;standard Watson-Crick geometry bps&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413815</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413815"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T01:54:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;.  This observation provides a novel molecular explanation of the importance Arg248, the most frequently mutated residue in cancer, for p53-DNA binding. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hoogsteen vs.  Watson-Crick Base pair in p53 Binding Sites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinct &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;shape of the minor groove recognized by Arg248&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; is due to a transition of the four A/T base pairs of the CATG core elements to a Hoogsteen base pairing geometry. Regions with Hoogsteen base pairs (red) &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;assume a reduced diameter of the double helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; compared to regions with Watson-Crick base pairs (blue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;WC bps&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;Hoogsteen geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413814</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413814"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T01:38:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;WC bps&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;Hoogsteen geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;Hoogsteen bps in helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413813</id>
		<title>P53-DNA Recognition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://proteopedia.org/index.php?title=P53-DNA_Recognition&amp;diff=1413813"/>
		<updated>2012-07-04T01:37:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remo Rohs: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS TEMPLATE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Sandbox_Reserved_Remo_Rohs}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- PLEASE ADD YOUR CONTENT BELOW HERE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;This is a joint project of La Canada High School and University of Southern California students, mentored by Professor Remo Rohs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A Base Pairing Variant Enhances p53 Binding to a Response Element=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction and Biological Role of the Tumor Suppressor p53==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-intro.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Figure 1: Crystal structure of a p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex; [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=3kz8 PDB ID# 3KZ8]&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;&amp;gt;Kitayner M, Rozenberg H, Rohs R, Suad O, Rabinovich D, Honig B, Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(4):423-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-consensus.jpg|thumb|right|500px|Figure 2: p53 consensus site; R= A or G, Y= C or T, and W=A or T.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-domains.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3:  Frequency of p53 mutants associated with cancer derived from [http://www-p53.iarc.fr/ IARC TP53 database]. Domain architecture; N-ter=N-terminal, DBD=DNA binding domain&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;, Tet=Tetramerization&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;tetra&#039;&amp;gt;Jeffrey PD, Gorina S, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p53 tetramerization domain. Science 1995;267:1498-502.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and C-ter=C-terminal domain. Intermediate regions are fairly disordered.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Guardian of the Genome&#039;&#039;&#039;, the tumor suppressor p53 is central in the natural defense against human cancer. The protein is activated by stress factors that can compromise the genomic integrity of the cell, and this activation unleashes the function of p53 as transcription factor. It binds as a tetramer (Figure 1) to a large range of DNA response elements. The p53 consensus site  (Figure 2) is formed by two decameric half-sites, each containing a core element (red), that are separated by a variable number of base pairs (blue). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Binding of p53 to different response elements leads to distinct biological responses, such as cell-cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. These different pathways correspond, at least in part, to differences in p53-DNA binding affinity and stability, which are determined by specific protein-DNA interactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mutations of p53 residues are associated with 50% of human cancers. Such mutations are predominantly located in the p53-DNA binding domain (DBD) based on an analysis of human tumors (Figure 3). Particularly, arginine residues in the p53-DNA interface were found in tumors with high frequencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structural Description of p53-DNA Complex==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domain Architecture and Tetramerization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;P53tetra.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;250&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;left&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 4: Crystal structure of p53 tetramerization domain, [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1c26 PDB ID 1C26].&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/2&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;Structure load=&#039;3kz8bio-4mon.pdb.zip&#039; size=&#039;500&#039; frame=&#039;true&#039; align=&#039;right&#039; caption=&#039;Figure 5: Crystal structure of p53 DBD tetramer-DNA complex, PDB ID 3KZ8.&#039; scene=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 protein consists of the N-terminal transactivation, the DNA binding or core, the tetramerization, and the C-terminal regulatory domain (Figure 3). This Proteopedia page discusses protein-DNA recognition by p53, thus focuses on the DBD of p53. The only other domain for which structural information is available is the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Tetra/1&#039;&amp;gt;tetramerization domain&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which forms as a dimer of dimers with one alpha helix and one beta strand contributed by each p53 monomer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/6&#039;&amp;gt;DBD in tetrameric form binds to a response element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which consists of two half sites. These decameric half sites can be separated by a spacer of flexible length but in this case the spacer is of length zero base pairs. The &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Complex/7&#039;&amp;gt;p53 tetramer binds DNA as a dimer of dimers&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; with each dimer binding to one half site of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 DBD assumes the conformation of an &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Beta/1&#039;&amp;gt;immunoglobulin-like fold consisting of a beta sandwich&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;, which binds the response element in the major groove. A functionally important &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Zn/1&#039;&amp;gt;Zn2+ ion coordinates the Cys176, His179, Cys238, Cys242 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, thus, stabilizes the fold of the DBD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Protein-Protein Interactions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The p53 tetramer forms a relatively small &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Intra-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;intra-dimer with two salt bridges between Glu180 and Arg181 residues&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and, in comparison, a large &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Inter-dimer/4&#039;&amp;gt;inter-dimer interface with an extensive network of interactions&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. The actual molecular interactions and strength in binding can vary as a function of the sequence and spacer length of the response element.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Major Groove Base Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:p53-motif.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Figure 6: p53 binding site motif with G/C base pairs most conserved. PLoS has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protein side chains and base pairs form direct contacts in the major groove among which the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/5&#039;&amp;gt;contact between Arg280 and the guanine of the core element&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; contributes most to binding specificity. This highly specific readout is due to the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg280_contact/4&#039;&amp;gt;bidentate hydrogen bond formed between Arg280 and guanine&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. As a result of this &#039;&#039;&#039;base readout&#039;&#039;&#039; the identity of the G/C base pairs in the CWWG core elements is the most conserved position in p53 response elements (Figure 5).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another important contact is formed with the &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Lys_120/3&#039;&amp;gt;Lys120 residue from the L1 loop of the protein&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;. Lys120 is biologically very important because acetylation of this residue is known to trigger the apoptotic response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNA Backbone Contact===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kitayner-etal-Figure7.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 7: DNA shape readout of narrow minor groove regions with enhanced electrostatic potential by Arg248&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. Nature Publishing Group has provided permission for usage of this figure.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another arginine residue, &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg273/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg273 contacts the phosphodiester backbone&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; and seems to be important for p53-DNA binding.Moreover, Arg273 is the second most common missense mutation in human cancer (Figure 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minor Groove Shape Readout===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most commonly, however, the residue Arg248 is found mutated in human tumors. &amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Arg248/2&#039;&amp;gt;Arg248 contacts the minor groove&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt; although it does not usually form hydrogen bonds with the bases. Arg248 was shown to recognize regions of narrow minor groove associated with enhanced negative electrostatic potential&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;kitayner&#039;/&amp;gt;. This mechanism known as &#039;&#039;&#039;shape readout&#039;&#039;&#039; was found to be broadly employed by arginine residues&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nature&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1248-53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kmd_wcbp_closeup/1&#039;&amp;gt;WC bps&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Group:USC-LCHS/3kz8_ba_hoogsteencloseup/2&#039;&amp;gt;Hoogsteen geometry&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;scene name=&#039;Sandbox_Reserved_170/Hg_helix/2&#039;&amp;gt;Hoogsteen bps in helix&amp;lt;/scene&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Further Reading=&lt;br /&gt;
A more general discussion of structural origins of binding specificity in protein-DNA recognition has been published along with a suggestion for a new &#039;&#039;&#039;classification of protein-DNA readout modes&#039;&#039;&#039; that goes beyond the historical description of direct and indirect readout&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;annualreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:233-69.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Acknowledgements=&lt;br /&gt;
This Proteopedia page originates from the partnership of the Rohs Laboratory at the University of Southern California with La Canada High School. This partnership was initiated by Remo Rohs and Patty Compeau in September 2011 as &#039;&#039;&#039;Bioinformatics Institute&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is part of the Institutes of the 21st Century. Contributors to this page are USC graduate students Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Proteopedia editor Eran Hodis, and La Canada High School students (xxx). Research presented in this article has been conducted in the Shakked Lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, the Rohs and L. Chen Labs at USC, and the Honig Lab at Columbia University. Furthermore, technical help by Proteopedia editors Eran Hodis, Eric Martz, Jaime Prilusky, and Joel Sussman is acknowledged.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Remo Rohs</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>