Sandbox Reserved 199: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 75: Line 75:
Previously, researchers found the side chain position of <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_119/1'>His 119</scene> in the enzyme’s <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_all_models/5'>active site</scene> (<scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_active_site_space_fill/1'>spacefill</scene>) of NMR structures to be different than that of X-Ray Crystallography studies.  Crystals show a static position of this His 119 residue, yet NMR structures suggest a dynamic equilibrium between the two conformational puckers of the <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_119_imidazole/1'>His 119 imidazole ring</scene>.  This single residue difference between crystal and solution studies amplifies to cause a major difference in surrounding amino acid residues: <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4/1'>4</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4_106_107_108/1'>106-108</scene>, and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4_106_107_108_1/1'>116-118</scene>.  The researchers proposed that this difference is most likely due to pH induced charge repulsion of His 119 with <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_asp_14/1'>Asp 14</scene> and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_48/2'>His 48</scene> in solution.
Previously, researchers found the side chain position of <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_119/1'>His 119</scene> in the enzyme’s <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_all_models/5'>active site</scene> (<scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_active_site_space_fill/1'>spacefill</scene>) of NMR structures to be different than that of X-Ray Crystallography studies.  Crystals show a static position of this His 119 residue, yet NMR structures suggest a dynamic equilibrium between the two conformational puckers of the <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_119_imidazole/1'>His 119 imidazole ring</scene>.  This single residue difference between crystal and solution studies amplifies to cause a major difference in surrounding amino acid residues: <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4/1'>4</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4_106_107_108/1'>106-108</scene>, and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_residue_4_106_107_108_1/1'>116-118</scene>.  The researchers proposed that this difference is most likely due to pH induced charge repulsion of His 119 with <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_asp_14/1'>Asp 14</scene> and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_his_48/2'>His 48</scene> in solution.


More than 60 main-chain hydrogen bonds were observed, which closely corresponds to the number of hydrogen bonds determined in crystals; however, a few discrepancies existed such as hydrogen bonds between the amide proton on <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_17_14_dbl/1'>Thr 17 (NH)-Asp 14 (CO) carbonyl</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_49_47/1'>Glu 49 (NH)-Val 47 (CO)</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_32_28/1'>Ser 32 (NH)-Gln 28 (CO)</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_51-54/1'>Val 54 (NH)-Leu 51 (CO)</scene>, and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_73_63/1'>Cys 72 (NH)-Val 63 (CO)</scene>.  The researchers suggested these differences are most likely due to the same pH phenomenon mentioned above.
More than 60 main-chain hydrogen bonds were observed, which closely corresponds to the number of hydrogen bonds determined in crystals; however, a few discrepancies existed such as hydrogen bonds between the amide proton on <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_17_14_dbl/1'>Thr 17 (NH)-Asp 14 (CO) carbonyl</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_49_47/2'>Glu 49 (NH)-Val 47 (CO)</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_32_28/1'>Ser 32 (NH)-Gln 28 (CO)</scene>, <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_51-54/1'>Val 54 (NH)-Leu 51 (CO)</scene>, and <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_73_63/1'>Cys 72 (NH)-Val 63 (CO)</scene>.  The researchers suggested these differences are most likely due to the same pH phenomenon mentioned above.


The NMR structure also highlighted flexibility of RNase A.  Overall, the largest conformational flexibility was found in the side-chains.  Specifically, side-chain mobility is greatest in residues  <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_side_chain_flexibility/1'>1, 7, 15, 18, 24, 37, 59, 66, 94, 123, and 124</scene> (shown in white).  As expected, the backbone torsion angles were seen to be more rigid (less conformational flexibility) within the <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_active_site_rigidity/1'>active site (shown in white)</scene> of RNase A.
The NMR structure also highlighted flexibility of RNase A.  Overall, the largest conformational flexibility was found in the side-chains.  Specifically, side-chain mobility is greatest in residues  <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_side_chain_flexibility/1'>1, 7, 15, 18, 24, 37, 59, 66, 94, 123, and 124</scene> (shown in white).  As expected, the backbone torsion angles were seen to be more rigid (less conformational flexibility) within the <scene name='Sandbox_Reserved_199/2aas_-_active_site_rigidity/1'>active site (shown in white)</scene> of RNase A.