Sandbox20: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===DNA Binding=== | ===DNA Binding=== | ||
<Structure load='2EFW' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='RTP' scene='Sandbox20/2efw/3' /> | <Structure load='2EFW' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='RTP' scene='Sandbox20/2efw/3' /> | ||
[[Image:RTP a3 DNA binding.png | thumb | upright=1.2| left| DNA-binding interactions of the | [[Image:RTP a3 DNA binding.png | thumb | upright=1.2| left| DNA-binding interactions of the α3 helix of RTP.]] | ||
When an RTP dimer binds to a TerA or TerB site, the basic residues of the α3 helix are positioned in the major groove, and the β-ribbon rests within the minor groove. Non-specific ionic interactions between the N-terminus and the DNA backbone stabilise the complex. | When an RTP dimer binds to a TerA or TerB site, the basic residues of the α3 helix are positioned in the major groove, and the β-ribbon rests within the minor groove. Non-specific ionic interactions between the N-terminus and the DNA backbone stabilise the complex. | ||
It is known with some certainty that the RTP dimer adopts an asymmetric arrangement upon binding of the TerB site. In the [[2efw| C110S mutant]] complexed with the native TerB sequence, the two subunits interact differently with the DNA bases to produce wing-up and wing-down conformations. These can be distinguished by the angle the | It is known with some certainty that the RTP dimer adopts an asymmetric arrangement upon binding of the TerB site. In the [[2efw| C110S mutant]] complexed with the native TerB sequence, the two subunits interact differently with the DNA bases to produce wing-up and wing-down conformations. These can be distinguished by the angle the α2 helix makes with the α3 helix indicated in this <scene name='Sandbox20/2efw/14'>model</scene>. It is likely that asymmetry is also introduced when the RTP dimer binds to the TerA site, but the crystal structure of this complex has not been solved. | ||
The dissociation constant of the RTP-TerA complex is greater than that of RTP-TerB, indicating an inherently a lower binding affinity. However, following the binding of RTP to TerA, a positive cooperative effect facilitates the binding of RTP to TerA (Reference!). It has been proposed that RTP bends the DNA at the TerB site in a manner that favours RTP binding at TerA. The RTP dimer at TerB may also present a surface for stabilising interactions with the dimer at TerA through its β1 loop and β3 strand. | The dissociation constant of the RTP-TerA complex is greater than that of RTP-TerB, indicating an inherently a lower binding affinity. However, following the binding of RTP to TerA, a positive cooperative effect facilitates the binding of RTP to TerA (Reference!). It has been proposed that RTP bends the DNA at the TerB site in a manner that favours RTP binding at TerA. The RTP dimer at TerB may also present a surface for stabilising interactions with the dimer at TerA through its β1 loop and β3 strand. | ||