G09SecL04Tpc2: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
=== LA-2 Recognition === | === LA-2 Recognition === | ||
<Structure load='1fj1' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='OspA and LA-2 Fab Complex' scene='G09SecL04Tpc2/Ospala2/1' /> | <Structure load='1fj1' size='300' frame='true' align='right' caption='OspA and LA-2 Fab Complex' scene='G09SecL04Tpc2/Ospala2/1' /> | ||
Since NMR chemical shifts are greatly sensitive to magnetic (local) environments, they are great for sensing conformational changes; NMR chemical-shift perturbation was an important method in identifying this three- loop epitope of OspA, but more importantly it also portrayed that these three loops were strongly antigenic. In a study conducted in 2000, Wei Ding and fellow colleagues illustrated the <scene name='G09SecL04Tpc2/Ospala2/2'> | Since NMR chemical shifts are greatly sensitive to magnetic (local) environments, they are great for sensing conformational changes; NMR chemical-shift perturbation was an important method in identifying this three- loop epitope of OspA, but more importantly it also portrayed that these three loops were strongly antigenic. In a study conducted in 2000, Wei Ding and fellow colleagues illustrated the <scene name='G09SecL04Tpc2/Ospala2/2'>binding Site</scene> through NMR and crystallography: LA-2 makes a concave-like groove over the 3 loops on the tip of the c-terminus through direct contact by heavy and light chains includng interactions between its R groups. | ||
Subsequent NMR results suggested that the overall c-terminal was basically unchanged by LA-2 binding, except for the minor shifts in the conformations of the 3 loops; the conformations results in order to accommodate interactions witht Fab. Further analysis of amide proton exchange rates supported this by proving that the n-terminal and central sheet domains were stable while the c-terminal domain illustrated great fluctuation in respect to its 3 loops. Specifically, Loops 2 and 3 were only subject to slight change in comparison to Loop 1’s dramatic increase. | Subsequent NMR results suggested that the overall c-terminal was basically unchanged by LA-2 binding, except for the minor shifts in the conformations of the 3 loops; the conformations results in order to accommodate interactions witht Fab. Further analysis of amide proton exchange rates supported this by proving that the n-terminal and central sheet domains were stable while the c-terminal domain illustrated great fluctuation in respect to its 3 loops. Specifically, Loops 2 and 3 were only subject to slight change in comparison to Loop 1’s dramatic increase. | ||