Sandbox Reserved 933: Difference between revisions

Line 23:

</StructureSection>

== LEAFY Evolution ==

[[Image:Structure_course.007.jpg|700px|left|thumb| Figure 4. A summary of LEAFY evolution by substation in three residues on three different types of DNA binding motif. Position 312 and 345 are mainly responsible for the difference between type I and type II binding motif (AtLFY and PpLFY). In algae, LFY binds to the type III motif is largely because amino acid substitution disrupt the interface of dimer (TsLFY). In this figure, 3D structures were visualized by MacPymol with assemblies of 2VY1 and 4BHK. Lower 2D diagrams present how different LFY interact with three types of binding motifs. Information in the diagram were summarized from reference <ref name="Hames2008" /><ref name="Sayou2014" /> and further visualized by keynote.]]

[[Image:Structure_course.007.jpg|700px|left|thumb| Figure 4. A summary of LEAFY evolution by substation in three residues on three different types of DNA binding motif. Position 312 and 345 are mainly responsible for the difference between type I and type II binding motif (AtLFY and PpLFY). In algae, LFY binds to the type III motif is largely because amino acid substitution disrupt the interface of dimer (TsLFY). In this figure, 3D structures were visualized by MacPymol with assemblies of 2VY1 and 4BHK. Lower 2D diagrams present how different LFY interact with three types of binding motifs. Information in the diagram were summarized from reference <ref name=''Hames2008'' /><ref name= ''Sayou2014'' /> and further visualized by keynote.]]

== Reference ==

Sandbox Reserved 933: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Tools

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 </StructureSection>
 == LEAFY Evolution ==
-[[Image:Structure_course.007.jpg|700px|left|thumb| Figure 4. A summary of LEAFY evolution by substation in three residues on three different types of DNA binding motif. Position 312 and 345 are mainly responsible for the difference between type I and type II binding motif (AtLFY and PpLFY). In algae, LFY binds to the type III motif is largely because amino acid substitution disrupt the interface of dimer (TsLFY). In this figure, 3D structures were visualized by MacPymol with assemblies of 2VY1 and 4BHK. Lower 2D diagrams present how different LFY interact with three types of binding motifs. Information in the diagram were summarized from reference <ref name="Hames2008" /><ref name="Sayou2014" /> and further visualized by keynote.]]
+[[Image:Structure_course.007.jpg|700px|left|thumb| Figure 4. A summary of LEAFY evolution by substation in three residues on three different types of DNA binding motif. Position 312 and 345 are mainly responsible for the difference between type I and type II binding motif (AtLFY and PpLFY). In algae, LFY binds to the type III motif is largely because amino acid substitution disrupt the interface of dimer (TsLFY). In this figure, 3D structures were visualized by MacPymol with assemblies of 2VY1 and 4BHK. Lower 2D diagrams present how different LFY interact with three types of binding motifs. Information in the diagram were summarized from reference <ref name=''Hames2008''  /><ref name= ''Sayou2014''  /> and further visualized by keynote.]]
 == Reference ==
 <references/>