Practical Guide to Homology Modeling: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:


You don’t need a homology model if the amino acid sequence of interest (the query sequence) already has an empirically determined 3D structure. Structures determined empirically, by X-ray crystallography or (much less often) by solution NMR, will almost always be more accurate than a homology model.
You don’t need a homology model if the amino acid sequence of interest (the query sequence) already has an empirically determined 3D structure. Structures determined empirically, by X-ray crystallography or (much less often) by solution NMR, will almost always be more accurate than a homology model.
=== Is there an empirical model? ===
All published, empirically-determined, atomic-resolution, macromolecular 3D structures are available in the [[[Protein Data Bank]] (PDB, pdb.org).
Each model in the PDB has a unique 4-character identification code ([[PDB ID]]) that begins with a numeral, and has letters or numerals for the last 3 characters . Examples are 1d66, 4mdh, 9ins.
Here are two methods for finding out if your query amino acid sequence, or parts of it, have empirically-determined 3D structures in the PDB.


== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>