Odorant binding protein: Difference between revisions
Nurit Eliash (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nurit Eliash (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
BmorPBP has two conformations: The '''"closed form" (A)''' and the ''"open form" (B)''<ref>DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30950</ref>. The bombykol and the alpha-helix loacated in the c-terminus of the protein compete for the binding site: when the c-terminus is inside the binding cavity it get's an alpha helix shape, and the protien is in its "close form" (B), whereas in the "open form" (A) the c-terminus is outside of the protein and has no defined secondary structure. Binding experiments have shown that the B-form binds 15 times higher than the A-form <ref>doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501447102</ref>, therefore considered to be the carrier of the pheromone. The complex of the A-form and the pheromone, is then considered the form that activates the receptor. | BmorPBP has two conformations: The '''"closed form" (A)''' and the ''"open form" (B)''<ref>DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30950</ref>. The bombykol and the alpha-helix loacated in the c-terminus of the protein compete for the binding site: when the c-terminus is inside the binding cavity it get's an alpha helix shape, and the protien is in its "close form" (B), whereas in the "open form" (A) the c-terminus is outside of the protein and has no defined secondary structure. Binding experiments have shown that the B-form binds 15 times higher than the A-form <ref>doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501447102</ref>, therefore considered to be the carrier of the pheromone. The complex of the A-form and the pheromone, is then considered the form that activates the receptor. | ||
The <scene name='68/683383/1dqe-1gm0/ | The <scene name='68/683383/1dqe-1gm0/4'>transition between the two conformation</scene> is both pH and ligand dependent <ref>doi: 10.1073?pnas.251532998</ref><ref>DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.176</ref><ref>doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317706110</ref>. In short, the B-form (c-terminus outside the cavity) occurs only at neutral pH and in the presence of the ligand. The A-form (c-terminus inside the cavity) occurs at both low and neutral pH, yet at the latter only in the absence of ligand. Therefore, in neutral pH when the ligand is binding to the protein in its A-form, the complex formation causes a change in conformation to the B-form. However, both A and B forms are equally distributed in the lymph. | ||
{{Button Toggle AnimationOnPause}} | {{Button Toggle AnimationOnPause}} | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 28 January 2015
Introduction
Odorant-binding protein (OBP) are soluble proteins which involve in the processes of odorant detection in the olfactory sensilla [1]
Though functionally same, vertebrates and insects OBP have different origin and structure. OBPs are important for insect olfaction. For instance, OBP76a (LUSH) in the fly Drosophila melanogaster is required for the detection of the pheromone vaccenyl acetate [2] and has been proven to adopt a conformation that activates the odorant receptor [3].


OBP in insects
OBP Function
Despite five decades of intensive research, the exact roles of OBP and the mechanism by which the odorant receptor (OR) is activated are still in dispute [4][5].
A few functions have been suggested for OBP:
1. Solubelizing the odorant molecule and its transportation in the sensillar lymph.
2. Protecting the odorant molecule from the odorant degrading enzymes, in the sensillar lymph.
3. Activating of the odorant receptor on the dendrite membrane, by the odorant-OBP complex.
4. Mediating the deactivation of the odorant molecule after the activation of the receptor.
5. An organic anion (the protein has 9 negative charges).
Of all, the first role of OBP as an odorant solubilizer and carrier is generally accepted.
In order to explain the structure and function of these fascinating proteins, this page will further focus on a particular OBP - the well investigated Bombyx mori PBP: BmorPBP.
Bombyx mori BmorPBP (lets talk about sex..)
| |||||||||||
See also
References
- ↑ Pelosi P, Iovinella I, Felicioli A, Dani FR. Soluble proteins of chemical communication: an overview across arthropods. Front Physiol. 2014 Aug 27;5:320. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00320. eCollection, 2014. PMID:25221516 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00320
- ↑ Xu P, Atkinson R, Jones DN, Smith DP. Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):193-200. PMID:15664171 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.031
- ↑ Laughlin JD, Ha TS, Jones DN, Smith DP. Activation of pheromone-sensitive neurons is mediated by conformational activation of pheromone-binding protein. Cell. 2008 Jun 27;133(7):1255-65. PMID:18585358 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.046
- ↑ Leal WS. Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:373-91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635. Epub, 2012 Sep 27. PMID:23020622 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635
- ↑ Kaissling KE. Olfactory perireceptor and receptor events in moths: a kinetic model revised. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Oct;195(10):895-922. , doi: 10.1007/s00359-009-0461-4. Epub 2009 Aug 21. PMID:19697043 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0461-4
Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)
Nurit Eliash, Michal Harel, Alexander Berchansky, Joel L. Sussman, Jaime Prilusky

