Sandbox Reserved 1180: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Allie Paton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Allie Paton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Structural Considerations== | ==Structural Considerations== | ||
The class B GPCRs, of which GCGR is a member, are different from other Class A GPCRs in several ways. The first is that class B GPCRs contain a protrusion known as a 'stalk,' which is a three α-helical turn elongation of the N-terminus that protrudes past the extracellular (EC) membrane. Structural integrity of this domain in GCGR is essential to ligand binding affinity. (Fig's 1 and 2) | The class B GPCRs, of which GCGR is a member, are different from other Class A GPCRs in several ways. The first is that class B GPCRs contain a protrusion known as a 'stalk,' which is a three α-helical turn elongation of the N-terminus that protrudes past the extracellular (EC) membrane. Structural integrity of this domain in GCGR is essential to ligand binding affinity. (Fig's 1 and 2) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
Most notably, class B GPCRs contain a prominent central splay (Fig. 4) <scene name='72/727091/Corticotropin_glucagon_aligned/1'>(two Class B protein receptors demonstrating central splay)</scene> which is solvent filled and accessible from the extracellular side. This central splay is notably absent from class A GPCRs (Fig. 5) <scene name='72/727091/B2-adrenergic_glucagon_aligned/9'>(Class A vs. Class B GPCRs)</scene>, represents a tantalizing target for agonists/antagonists, and is the focus of much current research into GCGR signal regulation. <ref name= "Hollenstein 2014"/> | Most notably, class B GPCRs contain a prominent central splay (Fig. 4) <scene name='72/727091/Corticotropin_glucagon_aligned/1'>(two Class B protein receptors demonstrating central splay)</scene> which is solvent filled and accessible from the extracellular side. This central splay is notably absent from class A GPCRs (Fig. 5) <scene name='72/727091/B2-adrenergic_glucagon_aligned/9'>(Class A vs. Class B GPCRs)</scene>, represents a tantalizing target for agonists/antagonists, and is the focus of much current research into GCGR signal regulation. <ref name= "Hollenstein 2014"/> | ||
[[Image:Protter GLR HUMAN.png |400 px|left|thumb|Fig. 6: Snake Plot of GCGR TMD<ref name= "Siu 2013"/>]] | [[Image:Protter GLR HUMAN.png |400 px|left|thumb|Fig. 6: Snake Plot of GCGR TMD<ref name= "Siu 2013"/>]] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 57: | ||
Class B secretin-like receptors have gained relevance in therapeutics and drug targets. Maintaining information about the class B GPCRs conformational flexibility, allows for a better understanding of the receptor-ligand binding and its pharmaceutical relevance. The 7TM structure offers a direct connect between the extracellular and intracellular region, which offers a mechanism for signal transduction within the cell. GPCRs regulate cellular processes as required by the organs in which they are located. GPCR’s are used in the functioning of neuron synapses, ion transport regulation, homeostasis, cell division, and cell morphology. Mutations in the GPCR have been linked with retinitis pigmentosa, female infertility, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. <ref name= "Salon 2011">DOI 10.1124/pr.110.003350</ref> | Class B secretin-like receptors have gained relevance in therapeutics and drug targets. Maintaining information about the class B GPCRs conformational flexibility, allows for a better understanding of the receptor-ligand binding and its pharmaceutical relevance. The 7TM structure offers a direct connect between the extracellular and intracellular region, which offers a mechanism for signal transduction within the cell. GPCRs regulate cellular processes as required by the organs in which they are located. GPCR’s are used in the functioning of neuron synapses, ion transport regulation, homeostasis, cell division, and cell morphology. Mutations in the GPCR have been linked with retinitis pigmentosa, female infertility, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and familial exudative vitreoretinopathy. <ref name= "Salon 2011">DOI 10.1124/pr.110.003350</ref> | ||
A variety of small molecule modulators have been developed over the past several years providing the promise of enhanced pharmaceutical regulation of GCGR. <ref name= "Yang 2015"/>(Fig's. 12 and 13) | A variety of small molecule modulators have been developed over the past several years providing the promise of enhanced pharmaceutical regulation of GCGR. <ref name= "Yang 2015"/>(Fig's. 12 and 13) | ||
| Line 68: | Line 62: | ||
[[Image:Small molecule modulators Page 2.jpg|150 px|right|thumb|Fig. 13: Small molecule regulators of GCGR, part 2<ref name= "Yang 2015"/>.]] | [[Image:Small molecule modulators Page 2.jpg|150 px|right|thumb|Fig. 13: Small molecule regulators of GCGR, part 2<ref name= "Yang 2015"/>.]] | ||
Utilizing the visualizations of the GCGR 7TMD and glucagon peptide ligand, dimensional/structural analyses can be performed to develop models for novel molecules of increasing specificity for GCGR binding/regulation. Performing a dimensional analysis between the binding pocket and the base of the EC stalk, a large pseudopeptide molecule of 17-24 angstroms in size could be utilized to mimic the characteristics of GCGR's natural ligand, glucagon. (Fig's. 14 and 15) | Utilizing the visualizations of the GCGR 7TMD and glucagon peptide ligand, dimensional/structural analyses can be performed to develop models for novel molecules of increasing specificity for GCGR binding/regulation. Performing a dimensional analysis between the binding pocket and the base of the EC stalk, a large pseudopeptide molecule of 17-24 angstroms in size could be utilized to mimic the characteristics of GCGR's natural ligand, glucagon. (Fig's. 14 and 15) | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 68: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||