Sandbox Reserved 1053: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== DNA Binding == | == DNA Binding == | ||
Ser 54, Ser 57, and His 58 have been found to be the main <scene name='69/694219/Serandhisresidues/3'>sites of DNA interaction</scene>. <scene name='69/694220/2kjb_dna_alpha_4_helix/1'>These residues</scene> are likely to interact with the 5'-TGAA sequence found in the half-site of the DNA, where the alpha 4 helices <scene name='69/694219/Czra_with_dna/2'>form an interaction with DNA</scene>. These residues are found in the N terminal of the alpha 4 helix (figure 3). Additionally, Val 42 and Gln 53 are involved in the <scene name='69/694219/Dna_binding_pocket/1'>DNA binding pocket</scene>. This conclusion was experimentally determined by mutagenesis of the Gln and Val with Ala residues and measuring the mutant DNA binding capacity. In a previously published article <ref name="critical"/>, the DNA bound state of | Ser 54, Ser 57, and His 58 have been found to be the main <scene name='69/694219/Serandhisresidues/3'>sites of DNA interaction</scene>. <scene name='69/694220/2kjb_dna_alpha_4_helix/1'>These residues</scene> are likely to interact with the 5'-TGAA sequence found in the half-site of the DNA, where the alpha 4 helices <scene name='69/694219/Czra_with_dna/2'>form an interaction with DNA</scene>. These residues are found in the N terminal of the alpha 4 helix (figure 3). Additionally, Val 42 and Gln 53 are involved in the <scene name='69/694219/Dna_binding_pocket/1'>DNA binding pocket</scene>. This conclusion was experimentally determined by mutagenesis of the Gln and Val with Ala residues and measuring the mutant DNA binding capacity. In a previously published article <ref name="critical"/>, the DNA bound state of Czr A was tested by using the known critical residues for DNA interactions. <scene name='69/694220/Dna_binding_experiment/1'> Critical DNA binding residues</scene> Gln 53, Val 42 (red), Ser 54, Ser 57, and His 58 (orange) were individually mutated to Ala, and kinetic experiments were performed. Compared to wild type Czr A, mutating Gln53 and V42 residues resulted in an 11-fold and 160-fold decrease in K<sub>a</sub>, respectively. Mutations to the main DNA interaction sites Ser 54, Ser 57, and His 58 resulted in binding similar to the <scene name='69/694220/Dna_residues_when_inhibited/1'>fully inhibited Zn<sup>2+</sup> bound state</scene>. The conformational change that occurs from the Zinc to DNA bound state regarding these residues is small, but the alpha 4 helix (shown in green in Figure 2) does subtly move. Because no major physical change occurs between these two states, it further supports that this region is the main DNA interaction site because of the loss of affinity after the mutation took place. Table 1 in this same article shows the different K<sub>observed</sub>, and the measured decrease in K<sub>observed</sub> for each mutation. The bind between the DNA and the protein can be attributed to losing certain intermolecular forces such as possible hydrogen bonding when changing from Gln and Ala, and a loss of London Dispersion forces in the Val to Ala change. | ||
The differences in binding favorability can also be seen when comparing the ΔG for the Apo-state vs. the DNA bound state and the Zinc vs. the Zinc and DNA bound state. These ΔGs were found to be -15.2kcal/mol and -9kcal/mol respectively<ref>DOI: 10.1021/ja208047b</ref>. This agrees with previously published data showing the Zinc binding inhibits the affinity the protein has to DNA. | The differences in binding favorability can also be seen when comparing the ΔG for the Apo-state vs. the DNA bound state and the Zinc vs. the Zinc and DNA bound state. These ΔGs were found to be -15.2kcal/mol and -9kcal/mol respectively<ref>DOI: 10.1021/ja208047b</ref>. This agrees with previously published data showing the Zinc binding inhibits the affinity the protein has to DNA. | ||