Biological Unit: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Line 89: Line 89:
===Unreliability of REMARK 350 in the PDB File Header===
===Unreliability of REMARK 350 in the PDB File Header===
When a structure is deposited in the [[PDB]], the authors are required to specify the biological unit if it is known. This is given in REMARK 350 in the header of the [[PDB file format]]. Unfortunately, information in REMARK 350 is often incorrect (see [https://lists.wwpdb.org/empathy/thread/DNQIHDGCX3E64AJT5ABCTNFW2EJZTGAS discussion of this problem by Roland Dunbrack])<ref name="xudunbrackpreprint" /><ref name="xudunbrack" />. There are numerous examples in which the authors state that the biological unit is a monomer in REMARK 350, but provide good experimental evidence in the paper reporting the structure that the biological unit is a dimer. Jose Duarte provided a [https://lists.wwpdb.org/empathy/thread/FNLXQHDEEHGFT7UID3WDYWUFFARTMTN7 list of examples].
When a structure is deposited in the [[PDB]], the authors are required to specify the biological unit if it is known. This is given in REMARK 350 in the header of the [[PDB file format]]. Unfortunately, information in REMARK 350 is often incorrect (see [https://lists.wwpdb.org/empathy/thread/DNQIHDGCX3E64AJT5ABCTNFW2EJZTGAS discussion of this problem by Roland Dunbrack])<ref name="xudunbrackpreprint" /><ref name="xudunbrack" />. There are numerous examples in which the authors state that the biological unit is a monomer in REMARK 350, but provide good experimental evidence in the paper reporting the structure that the biological unit is a dimer. Jose Duarte provided a [https://lists.wwpdb.org/empathy/thread/FNLXQHDEEHGFT7UID3WDYWUFFARTMTN7 list of examples].
Also unfortunately, in 2022, the wwPDB is adding REMARK 350 to PDB-format files originally
deposited without that remark, mostly models determined by [[NMR]]. What is unfortunate is that the added REMARK 350 specifies "AUTHOR DETERMINED", although it appears that the authors are not being consulted. An example is [[2z59]], which lacked REMARK 350 until it was added on March 16, 2022 (see the REVDAT records in the PDB format file).


In some cases, more than one putative biological unit is specified in REMARK 350. Biological units specified by the author(s) are distinguished from those predicted by software. An example is [[3fad]], which is explained in [https://pdb101.rcsb.org/learn/guide-to-understanding-pdb-data/biological-assemblies Introduction to Biological Assemblies and the PDB Archive].
In some cases, more than one putative biological unit is specified in REMARK 350. Biological units specified by the author(s) are distinguished from those predicted by software. An example is [[3fad]], which is explained in [https://pdb101.rcsb.org/learn/guide-to-understanding-pdb-data/biological-assemblies Introduction to Biological Assemblies and the PDB Archive].