|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:1ii1.gif|left|200px]] | | {{Seed}} |
| | [[Image:1ii1.png|left|200px]] |
|
| |
|
| <!-- | | <!-- |
| Line 9: |
Line 10: |
| {{STRUCTURE_1ii1| PDB=1ii1 | SCENE= }} | | {{STRUCTURE_1ii1| PDB=1ii1 | SCENE= }} |
|
| |
|
| '''Structural Basis for Poor Uracil Excision from Hairpin DNA: NMR Study'''
| | ===Structural Basis for Poor Uracil Excision from Hairpin DNA: NMR Study=== |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ==Overview==
| | <!-- |
| Two-dimensional NMR and molecular dynamics simulations have been used to determine the three-dimensional structures of two hairpin DNA structures: d-CTAGAG GATCCUTTTGGATCCT (abbreviated as U1-hairpin) and d-CTAGAGGATCCTTUTGGATCCT (abbreviated as U3-hairpin). The 1H resonances of both of these hairpin structures have been assigned almost completely. NMR restrained molecular dynamics and energy minimization procedures have been used to describe the three-dimensional structures of these hairpins. This study and concurrent NMR structural studies on two other d-CTAGAGGA TCCTUTTGGATCCT (abbreviated as U2-hairpin) and d-CTAGAGGATCCTTTUGGATCCT (abbreviated as U4-hairpin) have shed light upon various interactions reported between Echerichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) and uracil-containing DNA. The backbone torsion angles, which partially influence the local conformation of U12 and U14 in U1 and U3-hairpins, respectively, are probably locked in the trans conformation as in the case of U13 in the U2-hairpin. Such a stretched-out backbone conformation in the vicinity of U12 and U14 is thought to be the reason why the Km value is poor for U1- and U3-hairpins as it is for the U2-hairpin. Furthermore, the bases U12 and U14 in both U1- and U3-hairpins adopt an anti conformation, in contrast with the base conformation of U13 in the U2-hairpin, which adopts a syn conformation. The clear discrepancy observed in the U-base orientation with respect to the sugar moieties could explain why the Vmax value is 10- to 20-fold higher for the U1- and U3-hairpins compared with the U2-hairpin. Taken together, these observations support our interpretation that the unfavourable backbone results in a poor Km value, whereas the unfavourable nucleotide conformation results in a poor Vmax value. These two parameters therefore make the U1- and U3-hairpins better substrates for UDG compared with the U2-hairpin, as reported earlier [Kumar, N. V. & Varshney, U. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2336-2343.].
| | The line below this paragraph, {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_11952790}}, adds the Publication Abstract to the page |
| | (as it appears on PubMed at http://www.pubmed.gov), where 11952790 is the PubMed ID number. |
| | --> |
| | {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_11952790}} |
|
| |
|
| ==About this Structure== | | ==About this Structure== |
| Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1II1 OCA]. | | Full experimental information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1II1 OCA]. |
|
| |
|
| ==Reference== | | ==Reference== |
| Line 29: |
Line 33: |
| [[Category: Udg-uracil interaction]] | | [[Category: Udg-uracil interaction]] |
| [[Category: Uracil]] | | [[Category: Uracil]] |
| ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Fri May 2 20:01:32 2008'' | | |
| | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Tue Jul 1 12:14:16 2008'' |