|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:1obu.gif|left|200px]] | | {{Seed}} |
| | [[Image:1obu.png|left|200px]] |
|
| |
|
| <!-- | | <!-- |
| Line 9: |
Line 10: |
| {{STRUCTURE_1obu| PDB=1obu | SCENE= }} | | {{STRUCTURE_1obu| PDB=1obu | SCENE= }} |
|
| |
|
| '''APOCRUSTACYANIN C1 CRYSTALS GROWN IN SPACE AND EARTH USING VAPOUR DIFFUSION GEOMETRY'''
| | ===APOCRUSTACYANIN C1 CRYSTALS GROWN IN SPACE AND EARTH USING VAPOUR DIFFUSION GEOMETRY=== |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ==Overview==
| | <!-- |
| Models of apocrustacyanin C(1) were refined against X-ray data recorded on Bending Magnet 14 at the ESRF to resolutions of 1.85 and 2 A from a space-grown and an earth-grown crystal, respectively, both using vapour-diffusion crystal-growth geometry. The space crystals were grown in the APCF on the NASA Space Shuttle. The microgravity crystal growth showed a cyclic nature attributed to Marangoni convection, thus reducing the benefits of the microgravity environment, as reported previously [Chayen et al. (1996), Q. Rev. Biophys. 29, 227-278]. A subsequent mosaicity evaluation, also reported previously, showed only a partial improvement in the space-grown crystals over the earth-grown crystals [Snell et al. (1997), Acta Cryst. D53, 231-239], contrary to the case for lysozyme crystals grown in space with liquid-liquid diffusion, i.e. without any major motion during growth [Snell et al. (1995), Acta Cryst. D52, 1099-1102]. In this paper, apocrustacyanin C(1) electron-density maps from the two refined models are now compared. It is concluded that the electron-density maps of the protein and the bound waters are found to be better overall for the structures of apocrustacyanin C(1) studied from the space-grown crystal compared with those from the earth-grown crystal, even though both crystals were grown using vapour-diffusion crystal-growth geometry. The improved residues are on the surface of the protein, with two involved in or nearby crystal lattice-forming interactions, thus linking an improved crystal-growth mechanism to the molecular level. The structural comparison procedures developed should themselves be valuable for evaluating crystal-growth procedures in the future.
| | The line below this paragraph, {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_12832753}}, adds the Publication Abstract to the page |
| | (as it appears on PubMed at http://www.pubmed.gov), where 12832753 is the PubMed ID number. |
| | --> |
| | {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_12832753}} |
|
| |
|
| ==About this Structure== | | ==About this Structure== |
| Line 32: |
Line 36: |
| [[Category: Pigment]] | | [[Category: Pigment]] |
| [[Category: Transport protein]] | | [[Category: Transport protein]] |
| ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Sat May 3 03:38:33 2008'' | | |
| | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Mon Jul 28 00:42:21 2008'' |