ConSurfDB vs. ConSurf: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Line 166: Line 166:
With the default ConSurf Server result (APD 1.42), salt bridged residues are less conserved than average. With a custom ConSurf Server result APD 0.91, the salt-bridged residues rise to average conservation. With a custom result APD 0.48, the between-chain salt bridges have above-average conservation (7.6 vs. 6.2), while the within-chain salt bridges have average conservation (6.3). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.'''
With the default ConSurf Server result (APD 1.42), salt bridged residues are less conserved than average. With a custom ConSurf Server result APD 0.91, the salt-bridged residues rise to average conservation. With a custom result APD 0.48, the between-chain salt bridges have above-average conservation (7.6 vs. 6.2), while the within-chain salt bridges have average conservation (6.3). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.'''


<table class="wikitable">
<table class="wikitable" align="center">
<tr>
<tr>
  <td colspan=5>
Salt Bridges in [[4dnw]]
  </td>
</tr><tr>
   <td rowspan=2>
   <td rowspan=2>
[[#Average Pairwise Distance|APD]]
[[#Average Pairwise Distance|APD]]