|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:2qrz.jpg|left|200px]] | | {{Seed}} |
| | [[Image:2qrz.png|left|200px]] |
|
| |
|
| <!-- | | <!-- |
| Line 9: |
Line 10: |
| {{STRUCTURE_2qrz| PDB=2qrz | SCENE= }} | | {{STRUCTURE_2qrz| PDB=2qrz | SCENE= }} |
|
| |
|
| '''Cdc42 bound to GMP-PCP: Induced Fit by Effector is Required'''
| | ===Cdc42 bound to GMP-PCP: Induced Fit by Effector is Required=== |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ==Overview==
| | <!-- |
| GTP-binding (G) proteins regulate the flow of information in cellular signaling pathways by alternating between a GTP-bound "active" state and a GDP-bound "inactive" state. Cdc42, a member of the Rho family of Ras-related small G-proteins, plays key roles in the regulation of cell shape, motility, and growth. Here we describe the high resolution x-ray crystal structure for Cdc42 bound to the GTP analog guanylyl beta,gamma-methylene-diphosphonate (GMP-PCP) (i.e. the presumed signaling-active state) and show that it is virtually identical to the structures for the signaling-inactive, GDP-bound form of the protein, contrary to what has been reported for Ras and other G-proteins. Especially surprising was that the GMP-PCP- and GDP-bound forms of Cdc42 did not show detectable differences in their Switch I and Switch II loops. Fluorescence studies using a Cdc42 mutant in which a tryptophan residue was introduced at position 32 of Switch I also showed that there was little difference in the Switch I conformation between the GDP- and GMP-PCP-bound states (i.e. <10%), which again differed from Ras where much larger changes in Trp-32 fluorescence were observed when comparing these two nucleotide-bound states (>30%). However, the binding of an effector protein induced significant changes in the Trp-32 emission specifically from GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, as well as in the phosphate resonances for GTP bound to this G-protein as indicated in NMR studies. An examination of the available structures for Cdc42 complexed to different effector proteins, versus the x-ray crystal structure for GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, provides a possible explanation for how effectors can distinguish between the GTP- and GDP-bound forms of this G-protein and ensure that the necessary conformational changes for signal propagation occur.
| | The line below this paragraph, {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_18348980}}, adds the Publication Abstract to the page |
| | (as it appears on PubMed at http://www.pubmed.gov), where 18348980 is the PubMed ID number. |
| | --> |
| | {{ABSTRACT_PUBMED_18348980}} |
|
| |
|
| ==About this Structure== | | ==About this Structure== |
| Line 37: |
Line 41: |
| [[Category: Nucleotide-binding]] | | [[Category: Nucleotide-binding]] |
| [[Category: Prenylation]] | | [[Category: Prenylation]] |
| ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Wed May 28 09:33:40 2008'' | | |
| | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Sun Jul 27 22:24:32 2008'' |