YbgF: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Although YbgF is conserved in most gram-negative organisms, the exact function of this protein is still unknown.  It may be involved in the late stages of cell division when the [[Tol]] complex is recruited to the area of septation, or also during invagination<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.
Although YbgF is conserved in most gram-negative organisms, the exact function of this protein is still unknown.  It may be involved in the late stages of cell division when the [[Tol]] complex is recruited to the area of septation, or also during invagination<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.


It is known that YbgF interacts with the C-terminal domain of TolA during the import of [[Colicin A]] into the cytoplasm<ref>PMID: 11994151</ref>.  The TPR domain in YgbF has been shown to bind to domain II in [[TolA]], with the binding site located between residues 280-313<ref name='Gerding'>PMID: 17233825</ref>.  The NTD is not directly involved with the binding to TolA, but is important for the transition of YbgF in its oligomeric state when binding to TolA.  This may be due to the NTD restricting the formation of the trimer state, allowing the TPR to bind with TolA<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.
It is known that YbgF interacts with the C-terminal domain of TolA during the import of [[Colicin A]] into the cytoplasm<ref name='Walberger'>PMID: 11994151</ref>.  The TPR domain in YgbF has been shown to bind to domain II in [[TolA]], with the binding site located between residues 280-313<ref name='Gerding'>PMID: 17233825</ref>.  The NTD is not directly involved with the binding to TolA, but is important for the transition of YbgF in its oligomeric state when binding to TolA.  This may be due to the NTD restricting the formation of the trimer state, allowing the TPR to bind with TolA<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.


Studies have shown that inactivation of the YbgF gene results in no discernible change in the activity of Tol<ref name="Walburger">PMID: 11994151</ref>.  Therefore, replacing the protein with another would not rescue any lost function.  Future research may look into comparison of different gram negative bacteria in order to determine if the function is conserved.  One particular organism that is known to not have this domain conserved is ''Chlamydiae''<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.  Future research may look into the functioning of its Tol system, with a the possible addition of the YbgF domain to study what effect this might have.
Studies have shown that inactivation of the YbgF gene results in no discernible change in the activity of Tol<ref name='Walberger'>PMID: 11994151</ref>.  Therefore, replacing the protein with another would not rescue any lost function.  Future research may look into comparison of different gram negative bacteria in order to determine if the function is conserved.  One particular organism that is known to not have this domain conserved is ''Chlamydiae''<ref name='Krachler'>PMID: 20816983</ref>.  Future research may look into the functioning of its Tol system, with a the possible addition of the YbgF domain to study what effect this might have.


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>