Sandbox 206: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
==== The Chromophore ====
==== The Chromophore ====


[[Image:Chromophore1MYW.gif |200px|left|thumb|Chromophore of Venus]]
Chromophores almost always arise in one of two forms: conjugated pi systems and metal complexes. In our case, the chromophore is a conjugated pi-bond system. In this type of chromophores, the electrons jump between energy levels that are extended pi orbitals, created by a series of alternating single and double bonds, often in aromatic systems.<ref>http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/uvvisible/theory.html#top</ref>.   
Chromophores almost always arise in one of two forms: conjugated pi systems and metal complexes. In our case, the chromophore is a conjugated pi-bond system. In this type of chromophores, the electrons jump between energy levels that are extended pi orbitals, created by a series of alternating single and double bonds, often in aromatic systems.<ref>http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/uvvisible/theory.html#top</ref>.   


The residues surrounding the Venus chromophore are similar to those surrounding the chromophore of EYFP. Electron density studies of Venus show an 11° angle between the planes of the chromophore and Tyr203, while the same angle measured in EYFP is 11.5–12.3°, making the plane of the Venus chromophore slightly more parallel than that of EYFP.  
The residues surrounding the Venus chromophore are similar to those surrounding the chromophore of EYFP. Electron density studies of Venus show an 11° angle between the planes of the chromophore and Tyr203, while the same angle measured in EYFP is 11.5–12.3°, making the plane of the Venus chromophore slightly more parallel than that of EYFP.  


[[Image:Chromophore1MYW.gif |200px|left|thumb|Chromophore of Venus]]
This small difference may account for a minor change in the absorption spectrum of Venus rela- tive to EYFP, as seen at a pH range of 4.6–8.6 and a 50 mM NaCl concentration. Although the position of the main absorp- tion maximum remains unchanged (516 nm) in both Venus and EYFP, a smaller peak resulting from the neutral (protonated) chromophore is shifted in Venus by 20 nm producing a peak at 413 nm versus 393 nm in EYFP. The slightly more parallel orientation of the aromatic rings of Tyr66 and Tyr203 might also help improve the π-π interaction, thus reducing the excited state energy of the neutral chromophore. If this is the case, we can hypothesize that at lower pH, which is favorable to chro- mophore protonation, the angle between the rings would be smaller than 11°.
This small difference may account for a minor change in the absorption spectrum of Venus rela- tive to EYFP, as seen at a pH range of 4.6–8.6 and a 50 mM NaCl concentration. Although the position of the main absorp- tion maximum remains unchanged (516 nm) in both Venus and EYFP, a smaller peak resulting from the neutral (protonated) chromophore is shifted in Venus by 20 nm producing a peak at 413 nm versus 393 nm in EYFP. The slightly more parallel orientation of the aromatic rings of Tyr66 and Tyr203 might also help improve the π-π interaction, thus reducing the excited state energy of the neutral chromophore. If this is the case, we can hypothesize that at lower pH, which is favorable to chro- mophore protonation, the angle between the rings would be smaller than 11°.