Sandbox Reserved 509: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

==Viral Defense against PKR Function==

Viruses spread throughout the body by invading cells and hijacking the protein production machinery of the cell in order to replicate. However, there are several defense mechanisms used to counter viral infection. One is protein kinase R (PKR). In an uninfected cell, PKR exists as an inactive molecule. However, the presence of viral RNA triggers the PKR to form an active dimer. The active PKR then binds to an initiation factor eIF2α and transfers a phosphate from an ATP to the eIF2α, thereby inhibiting cellular and viral protein synthesis.

[[Image:Figure 1-PKR and Viral Protein Conundrum.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''~~FIGURE~~ 1''']]

[[Image:Figure 1-PKR and Viral Protein Conundrum.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''Figure 1''']]

Viruses have evolved several mechanisms to subvert the PKR function (Figure 1). The VAI (Viral Associated I) RNA of adenovirus serves to prevent the dimerization and activation of PKR and inhibit the anti-viral response. Influenza virus p58IPK inhibits the activation of PKR. On the other hand, the smallpox virus K3L protein is a molecular mimic of eIF2α, acting as a competitive inhibitor and inhibits the phosphorylation reaction. Therefore fundamental understanding of this specific interaction between eIF2α and PKR and how viruses interfere with the reaction between the two is of paramount importance in developing anti-viral drugs.

==Data Pieces==

[[Image:Data Piece.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''Mutation of remote residue T487 eliminates eIF2α phosphorylation, but not autophosphorylation''']]

Lane 1: Wild type PKR, wild type eIF2α and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed and were resolved in a gel (lower panel stain). The gel was dried and autoradiographed (upper panel 33P). PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself (autophosphorylation indicated as PKR~P) as well as to the eIF2α indicated here as eIF2α~P). Lane 2: When wild type PKR, a mutated form of eIF2α-S51A (phosphorylation site is mutated to an alanine) and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed. PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself, but not to the eIF2α-S51A. These data confirm that the Ser51 residue is the phosphorylation site of eIF2α. Lanes 3 and 4: when PKR-T487A (PKR-T487D for the lane 4), wild type eIF2α and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed, PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself, but not to the eIF2α suggesting that the remote residue T487 is important for Ser51 phosphorylation. The residue T487 is located on the contact surface of PKR with eIF2α (Fig. 2), thus providing an experimental evidence of PKR-eIF2α structure and interaction at the remote region.

[[Image:Data Piece 2.jpg|left|331px|thumb|'''Disruption of hydrophobic cluster leads to Ser51 phosphorylation of the T487D mutant, bypassing helix aG interaction with eIF2a.''']]

[[Image:Picture for Data Piece 2.jpg|right|350px|thumb|'''The movement of Ser51 is restricted by a cluster of hydrophobic residues''']]

Figure on Left: Mutation of residue L50 that disrupts hydrophobic interaction causes a conformation change of Ser51 position. As a result PKR-T487D protein is able to transfer 33Pγ of ATP to the eIF2α-L50S, but not to the wild type eIF2α (as seen in the comparison of eIF2α~P lanes 5 and 7).

Figure on Right: A cluster of hydrophobic residues (L47, L50, I58 and I62) restricts the movement of Ser51 residue of eIF2α. These hydrophobic residues pull Ser51 in a hydrophobic pocket.

Sandbox Reserved 509: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Tools

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ==Viral Defense against PKR Function==
 Viruses spread throughout the body by invading cells and hijacking the protein production machinery of the cell in order to replicate. However, there are several defense mechanisms used to counter viral infection. One is protein kinase R (PKR). In an uninfected cell, PKR exists as an inactive molecule. However, the presence of viral RNA triggers the PKR to form an active dimer. The active PKR then binds to an initiation factor eIF2α and transfers a phosphate from an ATP to the eIF2α, thereby inhibiting cellular and viral protein synthesis.
-[[Image:Figure 1-PKR and Viral Protein Conundrum.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''FIGURE 1''']]
+[[Image:Figure 1-PKR and Viral Protein Conundrum.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''Figure 1''']]
 Viruses have evolved several mechanisms to subvert the PKR function (Figure 1). The VAI (Viral Associated I) RNA of adenovirus serves to prevent the dimerization and activation  of PKR and inhibit the anti-viral response.  Influenza virus p58IPK inhibits the activation of PKR. On the other hand, the smallpox virus K3L protein is a molecular mimic of eIF2α, acting as a competitive inhibitor and inhibits the phosphorylation reaction. Therefore fundamental understanding of this specific interaction between eIF2α and PKR and how viruses interfere with the reaction between the two is of paramount importance in developing anti-viral drugs.
+==Data Pieces==
+[[Image:Data Piece.jpg|center|375px|thumb|'''Mutation of remote residue T487 eliminates eIF2α phosphorylation, but not autophosphorylation''']]
+Lane 1:  Wild type PKR, wild type eIF2α and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed and were resolved in a gel (lower panel stain). The gel was dried and autoradiographed (upper panel 33P). PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself (autophosphorylation indicated as PKR~P) as well as to the eIF2α indicated here as eIF2α~P). Lane 2: When wild type PKR, a mutated form of eIF2α-S51A (phosphorylation site is mutated to an alanine) and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed. PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself, but not to the eIF2α-S51A. These data confirm that the Ser51 residue is the phosphorylation site of eIF2α. Lanes 3 and 4: when PKR-T487A (PKR-T487D for the lane 4), wild type eIF2α and 33Pγ-ATP were mixed, PKR transfers 33Pγ of ATP to itself, but not to the eIF2α suggesting that the remote residue T487 is important for Ser51 phosphorylation. The residue T487 is located on the contact surface of PKR with eIF2α (Fig. 2), thus providing an experimental evidence of PKR-eIF2α structure and interaction at the remote region.
+[[Image:Data Piece 2.jpg|left|331px|thumb|'''Disruption of hydrophobic cluster leads to Ser51 phosphorylation of the T487D mutant, bypassing helix aG interaction with eIF2a.''']]
+[[Image:Picture for Data Piece 2.jpg|right|350px|thumb|'''The movement of Ser51 is restricted by a cluster of hydrophobic residues''']]
+Figure on Left: Mutation of residue L50 that disrupts hydrophobic interaction causes a conformation change of Ser51 position. As a result PKR-T487D protein is able to transfer 33Pγ of ATP to the eIF2α-L50S, but not to the wild type eIF2α (as seen in the comparison of eIF2α~P lanes 5 and 7).
+Figure on Right: A cluster of hydrophobic residues (L47, L50, I58 and I62) restricts the movement of Ser51 residue of eIF2α. These hydrophobic residues pull Ser51 in a hydrophobic pocket.