[[Image:charge network residues.png|250 px|right|thumb|Figure 3. TAK-875 binding residues]]hGPR40 has a distinct binding pocket that is established by seven key residues. The importance of these residues for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agonist agonist] binding was determined by [https://www.neb.com/applications/cloning-and-synthetic-biology/site-directed-mutagenesis mutagenesis] studies. Each of these residues have either a charged or polar R-group that allows them to develop a charge network. This network keeps the residues in a stable, unbound state until exposed to a substrate. When the substrate (an agonist) enters the binding pocket, four of the seven <scene name='72/721541/Hydrogen_binding_1/3'>key binding residues</scene> interact directly with the carboxylate moiety of the agonist. In 2007 and 2009 researchers showed the presence of Arg 183 and Arg 258 in the binding pocket <ref name="Sum">PMID: 17699519</ref><ref name="Sum, C.">PMID:19068482</ref> Along with the two Arginine residues, the charge network incorporates two Tyrosine residues.These residues (Tyr 91 and Tyr 240) also stabilize the carboxylate of the agonists. It was further determined that Tyr 240 is epecially important for binding. Mutation of Tyr 240 caused a reduction in the binding affinity of TAK-875 by eight fold and had a significant effect on the Kd of the protein.<ref name="Srivastava"/>
[[Image:charge network residues.png|250 px|right|thumb|Figure 3. TAK-875 with key binding residues]]hGPR40 has a distinct binding pocket that is established by seven key residues. The importance of these residues for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agonist agonist] binding was determined by [https://www.neb.com/applications/cloning-and-synthetic-biology/site-directed-mutagenesis mutagenesis] studies. Each of these residues have either a charged or polar R-group that allows them to develop a charge network. This network keeps the residues in a stable, unbound state until exposed to a substrate. When the substrate (an agonist) enters the binding pocket, four of the seven <scene name='72/721541/Hydrogen_binding_1/3'>key binding residues</scene> interact directly with the carboxylate moiety of the agonist. In 2007 and 2009 researchers showed the presence of Arg 183 and Arg 258 in the binding pocket <ref name="Sum">PMID: 17699519</ref><ref name="Sum, C.">PMID:19068482</ref> Along with the two Arginine residues, the charge network incorporates two Tyrosine residues.These residues (Tyr 91 and Tyr 240) also stabilize the carboxylate of the agonists. It was further determined that Tyr 240 is epecially important for binding. Mutation of Tyr 240 caused a reduction in the binding affinity of TAK-875 by eight fold and had a significant effect on the Kd of the protein.<ref name="Srivastava"/>
=== ECL2 ===
=== ECL2 ===
Revision as of 13:18, 29 March 2016
Human GPR40, also known as Free Fatty Acid Receptor 1 (FFAR1)
Human G-protein coupled receptor 40 (hGPR40), also known as free fatty acid 1 receptor (FFAR1), is a seven helical transmembrane domain receptor for long-chain free fatty acids that stimulates insulin secretion.[1] This enzyme is primarily located in the pancreatic β-cells in the islets of Langerhans, and as such, it has become a target for potential Type II Diabetes treatments.[2] Activation of hGPR40 has been shown to both stimulate insulin secretion and decrease glucose concentration.[3] GPR40 is a member of a group of homologous GPCRs all located on chromosome 19q13.1 including GPR41, 42, and 43.[4]
Figure 1. Second proposed binding site of hGPR40.Figure 2. Third proposed binding site of hGPR40.
Radioligand binding studies identified multiple binding sites in hGPR40. Full agonists and partial agonists were shown to bind in separate sites with positive cooperativity[5]. The binding site for the partial agonist TAK-875 has been identified, but other binding sites were hypothesized. TAK-875 binds between transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 5 and underneath ECL2. By visual inspection, a second possible binding site was proposed between transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 5 on the intracellular side of the transmembrane helices. Also by visual inspection, a third possible binding site was proposed between transmembrane helices 1, 2, and 7 on the extracellular side of hGPR40, close to the TAK-875 binding site[1].
hGPR40 has a distinct binding pocket that is established by seven key residues. The importance of these residues for agonist binding was determined by mutagenesis studies. Each of these residues have either a charged or polar R-group that allows them to develop a charge network. This network keeps the residues in a stable, unbound state until exposed to a substrate. When the substrate (an agonist) enters the binding pocket, four of the seven key binding residues interact directly with the carboxylate moiety of the agonist. In 2007 and 2009 researchers showed the presence of Arg 183 and Arg 258 in the binding pocket [6][7] Along with the two Arginine residues, the charge network incorporates two Tyrosine residues.These residues (Tyr 91 and Tyr 240) also stabilize the carboxylate of the agonists. It was further determined that Tyr 240 is epecially important for binding. Mutation of Tyr 240 caused a reduction in the binding affinity of TAK-875 by eight fold and had a significant effect on the Kd of the protein.[1]
ECL2
Although it may be different in many ways, hGPR40 is similar to most G protein coupled receptors because it contains a highly conserved hairpin loop. This extracellular loop (ECL2), is accompanied by a disulfide bond and serves an important role in the protein. In hGPR40, ECL2 has two sections: a beta sheet and an auxiliary loop. The beta sheet (shown in cyan) spans helices 4 and 5. hGPR40's ECL2 differs from that of other proteins because it contains an auxiliary loop (magenta) of 13 extra residues. The entire extracellular loop has low mobility and flexibility. The allows it to act as a cap for the binding pocket. The only exception to the low flexibility is the tip of the auxiliary loop, which corresponds to residues Asp 152-Asn 155. This area of greater mobility allows for substrates to enter the binding site.[1]
Function
hGPR40 functions as a free fatty acid receptor that participates in insulin signaling to regulate blood glucose concentrations. There are multiple theoretical mechanisms for how hGPR40 accomplishes this.
Mechanism of Insulin Secretion
One proposed pathway of insulin secretion by hGPR40 involves the activation of the Gaq/11 protein complex. This complex then activates phospholipase C (PLC) which in turn phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 can then mediate the influx of Ca2+ caused by the binding of free fatty acids to hGPR40 by moving into the cytoplasm, binding to the endoplasmic reticulum, and allowing for the release of Ca2+ into the cytosol.[4] This increase in [Ca2+] amplifies the similar increase in [Ca2+] that results from high concentrations of glucose. In this way, hGPR40 mimics glucose dependent insulin secretion.[8]
Another pathway through which hGPR40 induces insulin expression is through phospholipase D1 (PKD1). When free fatty acids bind to hGPR40, it is able to phosphorylate and therefore activate PKD1. The PKD1 plays a role in controlling the organization of an actin network that lays in role in insulin secretion.[4]
Clinical Relevance
By signaling predominantly through Gaq/11, GPR40 increases intracellular calcium and activates phospholipases to generate diacylglycerols resulting in increased insulin secretion. Synthetic small-molecule agonists of GPR40 enhance insulin secretion in a glucosedependent manner in vitro and in vivo with a mechanism similar to that found with fatty acids. GPR40 agonists have shown efficacy in increasing insulin secretion and lowering blood glucose in rodent models of type 2 diabetes.[4]
TAK-875
Figure 4. Structure of TAK-875
One example of an hGPR40 agonist is Tak-875. The carboxylate moiety of the agonist enters through the it of the auxiliary loop, interrupts the charge network, and binds with Arg 183, Arg 258, Tyr 91, and Tyr 240.[1] TAK-875 has shown efficacy in increasing insulin secretion and lowering blood glucose in rodent models of type 2 diabetes.[4] This drug was studied in stage III clinical trials and was able to significantly reduce HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes that was not controlled by diet and exercise. However, clinical trials were stopped shortly after this study because TAK-875 was suspected of causing liver damage.[9]
↑ 1.01.11.21.31.41.5Srivastava A, Yano J, Hirozane Y, Kefala G, Gruswitz F, Snell G, Lane W, Ivetac A, Aertgeerts K, Nguyen J, Jennings A, Okada K. High-resolution structure of the human GPR40 receptor bound to allosteric agonist TAK-875. Nature. 2014 Jul 20. doi: 10.1038/nature13494. PMID:25043059 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13494
↑Kebede M, Ferdaoussi M, Mancini A, Alquier T, Kulkarni RN, Walker MD, Poitout V. Glucose activates free fatty acid receptor 1 gene transcription via phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-dependent O-GlcNAcylation of pancreas-duodenum homeobox-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 14;109(7):2376-81. doi:, 10.1073/pnas.1114350109. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PMID:22308370 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114350109
↑Ma Z, Lin DC, Sharma R, Liu J, Zhu L, Li AR, Kohn T, Wang Y, Liu JJ, Bartberger MD, Medina JC, Zhuang R, Li F, Zhang J, Luo J, Wong S, Tonn GR, Houze JB. Discovery of the imidazole-derived GPR40 agonist AM-3189. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016 Jan 1;26(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.050., Epub 2015 Nov 17. PMID:26620255 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.050
↑Lin DC, Guo Q, Luo J, Zhang J, Nguyen K, Chen M, Tran T, Dransfield PJ, Brown SP, Houze J, Vimolratana M, Jiao XY, Wang Y, Birdsall NJ, Swaminath G. Identification and pharmacological characterization of multiple allosteric binding sites on the free fatty acid 1 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;82(5):843-59. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.079640. Epub 2012 Aug , 2. PMID:22859723 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.112.079640
↑Sum CS, Tikhonova IG, Neumann S, Engel S, Raaka BM, Costanzi S, Gershengorn MC. Identification of residues important for agonist recognition and activation in GPR40. J Biol Chem. 2007 Oct 5;282(40):29248-55. Epub 2007 Aug 15. PMID:17699519 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M705077200
↑Sum CS, Tikhonova IG, Costanzi S, Gershengorn MC. Two arginine-glutamate ionic locks near the extracellular surface of FFAR1 gate receptor activation. J Biol Chem. 2009 Feb 6;284(6):3529-36. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806987200. Epub 2008, Dec 8. PMID:19068482 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806987200
↑Itoh Y, Kawamata Y, Harada M, Kobayashi M, Fujii R, Fukusumi S, Ogi K, Hosoya M, Tanaka Y, Uejima H, Tanaka H, Maruyama M, Satoh R, Okubo S, Kizawa H, Komatsu H, Matsumura F, Noguchi Y, Shinohara T, Hinuma S, Fujisawa Y, Fujino M. Free fatty acids regulate insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells through GPR40. Nature. 2003 Mar 13;422(6928):173-6. Epub 2003 Feb 23. PMID:12629551 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01478
↑Kaku K, Enya K, Nakaya R, Ohira T, Matsuno R. Efficacy and safety of fasiglifam (TAK-875), a G protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Jul;17(7):675-81. doi: 10.1111/dom.12467. Epub 2015 Apr, 23. PMID:25787200 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12467