Sandbox Reserved 1053: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:05, 21 April 2017 view source Mary Liggett (talk \| contribs) 38 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:06, 21 April 2017 view source Katelyn Baumer (talk \| contribs) 59 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 27:		Line 27:
	The differences in binding favorability can also be seen when comparing the ΔG for the Apo-state vs. the DNA bound state and the Zinc vs. the Zinc and DNA bound state. These ΔGs were found to be -15.2kcal/mol and -9kcal/mol respectively<ref>DOI: 10.1021/ja208047b</ref>. This agrees with previously published data showing the Zinc binding inhibits the affinity the protein has to DNA.		The differences in binding favorability can also be seen when comparing the ΔG for the Apo-state vs. the DNA bound state and the Zinc vs. the Zinc and DNA bound state. These ΔGs were found to be -15.2kcal/mol and -9kcal/mol respectively<ref>DOI: 10.1021/ja208047b</ref>. This agrees with previously published data showing the Zinc binding inhibits the affinity the protein has to DNA.

	[[Image:DNABound Final.PNG\|~~850px~~\|thumb\|center\| Figure 3:Side by side rotation showing the main DNA groove in CzrA]]		[[Image:DNABound Final.PNG\|750px\|thumb\|center\| Figure 3:Side by side rotation showing the main DNA groove in CzrA]]

Navigation menu