Unusual sequence numbering: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Authors do not always use the full-length sequence numbering when the structure of a fragment is reported. As mentioned above, in [http://firstglance.jmol.org/fgij/fg.htm?1pgb 1pgb] ([[1pgb]]), the crystallized protein is numbered 1-56. This despite it being a fragment of a [http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P06654#sequences 448-residue full length sequence] that begins (after adding an N-terminal Met) at full-length sequence number 228. | Authors do not always use the full-length sequence numbering when the structure of a fragment is reported. As mentioned above, in [http://firstglance.jmol.org/fgij/fg.htm?1pgb 1pgb] ([[1pgb]]), the crystallized protein is numbered 1-56. This despite it being a fragment of a [http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P06654#sequences 448-residue full length sequence] that begins (after adding an N-terminal Met) at full-length sequence number 228. | ||
===Starts With Negative Numbers=== | ===Starts With Zero Or Negative Numbers=== | ||
Sometimes the initial sequence number is zero. | Sometimes the initial sequence number is zero. | ||
