Sandbox Reserved 1626: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
==Regulation and Inhibition==
==Regulation and Inhibition==


[[Image:Ruthenium_Inhibitors.jpg|300 px|right|thumb|'''Fig. 2''' Structure of Ruthenium Red]]
[[Image:Ruthenium_Inhibitors.jpg|200 px|right|thumb|'''Fig. 2''' Structure of Ruthenium Red]]


The most well-known and commonly used inhibitor of the MCU is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruthenium_red ruthenium red] (RuRed).<ref name="Woods"/>  RuRed is a trinuclear, oxo-bridged complex that effectively inhibits calcium uptake without affecting mitochondrial respiration or calcium efflux.<ref name="Woods"/>  The disadvantage of ruthenium red is its challenging purification.<ref name="Woods"/> Interestingly, an impure version of RuRed, termed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ru360 Ru360], was found to be the active component of RuRed and thus another good inhibitor of the MCU.<ref name="Woods"/> Ru360 is a binuclear, oxo-bridged complex with a similar structure to that of RuRed.<ref name="Woods"/> The only flaw with Ru360 was that it showed low cell permeability, so Ru265 was developed and had twice the cell permeability of Ru360.<ref name="Woods"/> Ru265 possesses two bridged Ru centers bridged by a nitride ligand.<ref name="Woods"/>
The most well-known and commonly used inhibitor of the MCU is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruthenium_red ruthenium red] (RuRed).<ref name="Woods"/>  RuRed is a trinuclear, oxo-bridged complex that effectively inhibits calcium uptake without affecting mitochondrial respiration or calcium efflux.<ref name="Woods"/>  The disadvantage of ruthenium red is its challenging purification.<ref name="Woods"/> Interestingly, an impure version of RuRed, termed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ru360 Ru360], was found to be the active component of RuRed and thus another good inhibitor of the MCU.<ref name="Woods"/> Ru360 is a binuclear, oxo-bridged complex with a similar structure to that of RuRed.<ref name="Woods"/> The only flaw with Ru360 was that it showed low cell permeability, so Ru265 was developed and had twice the cell permeability of Ru360.<ref name="Woods"/> Ru265 possesses two bridged Ru centers bridged by a nitride ligand.<ref name="Woods"/>