AlphaFold2 examples from CASP 14: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The quality of predictions for the structure of ORF8 are judged by comparison with X-ray crystallographic [[empirical models]] which were not available to the groups making predictions. Shortly after the CASP 14 competition (summer 2020), two X-ray crystal structures were reported for ORF8: [[7jtl]] released August 26, 2020, and [[7jx6]], released September 23, 2020. The [[resolution|resolutions]] are 2.0 and 1.6 Å respectively, and both have worse than average [[Rfree]] values. | The quality of predictions for the structure of ORF8 are judged by comparison with X-ray crystallographic [[empirical models]] which were not available to the groups making predictions. Shortly after the CASP 14 competition (summer 2020), two X-ray crystal structures were reported for ORF8: [[7jtl]] released August 26, 2020, and [[7jx6]], released September 23, 2020. The [[resolution|resolutions]] are 2.0 and 1.6 Å respectively, and both have worse than average [[Rfree]] values. | ||
{{Template:Green links zoom}} | |||
The two X-ray structures agree very well: 87 of the 104 residues/chain align with a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root-mean-square_deviation_of_atomic_positions root mean square deviation] '''(RMSD) of 0.66 Å'''<ref>Alignment and RMSD calculation was by ''iterative magic fit'' of Swiss PDB Viewer.</ref>. | The two X-ray structures agree very well: 87 of the 104 residues/chain align with a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root-mean-square_deviation_of_atomic_positions root mean square deviation] '''(RMSD) of 0.66 Å'''<ref>Alignment and RMSD calculation was by ''iterative magic fit'' of Swiss PDB Viewer.</ref>. | ||
