AlphaFold2 examples from CASP 14: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
The quality of predictions for the structure of ORF8 are judged by comparison with X-ray crystallographic [[empirical models]] which were not available to the groups making predictions. Shortly after the CASP 14 competition (summer 2020), two X-ray crystal structures were reported for ORF8: [[7jtl]] released August 26, 2020, and [[7jx6]], released September 23, 2020. The [[resolution|resolutions]] are 2.0 and 1.6 Å respectively, and both have worse than average [[Rfree]] values.
The quality of predictions for the structure of ORF8 are judged by comparison with X-ray crystallographic [[empirical models]] which were not available to the groups making predictions. Shortly after the CASP 14 competition (summer 2020), two X-ray crystal structures were reported for ORF8: [[7jtl]] released August 26, 2020, and [[7jx6]], released September 23, 2020. The [[resolution|resolutions]] are 2.0 and 1.6 Å respectively, and both have worse than average [[Rfree]] values.
{{Template:Green links zoom}}
{{Template:Green links zoom}}
<scene name='87/875686/Morf_lin_7jx6_imf_7jtl/3'>The two X-ray structures agree very well</scene>. The only substantial disagreement is for an external loop, sequence range 47-58. See the TABLE below for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root-mean-square_deviation_of_atomic_positions RMSD] values.
<scene name='87/875686/Morf_lin_7jx6_imf_7jtl/3'>The two X-ray structures agree very well</scene>. The only substantial disagreement is for a large surface loop, sequence range 48-57. See the TABLE below for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root-mean-square_deviation_of_atomic_positions RMSD] values.


===AlphaFold2 Prediction for ORF8===
===AlphaFold2 Prediction for ORF8===