Sandbox Reserved 1794

Sodium Taurocholate Co-Transporting Polypeptide

spinqualitylabelsall models Show:Asymmetric Unit Biological Assembly Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate   Export Animated Image   Print3D Introduction Fig. 1: Taurocholic acid a crystalline bile acid Sodium Taurocholate Co-Transporting Polypeptide, or NTCP, is a membrane transporter protein found in the plasma membrane of hepatocytes. NTCP's primary function is the transportation of taurocholates, or bile salts, (Fig. 1) into the liver and out of the liver to the small intestine. Bile salts play various roles in metabolism and digestion, but their main function is the emulsification of lipid droplets into smaller fragments. This enables lipases to break down the droplets into their monomers, or triglycerides which are then able to be digested. NTCP is part of the solute carrier superfamily, SLC10. NTCP is the founding member of the SLC10 family, first discovered in rat hepatocytes in 1978. NTCP has a key role in enterohepatic circulation or bile salt recycling, and its unique ability to transport other solutes gives it therapeutic potential for lowering cholesterol and treating liver disease. In addition to its physiological role in bile salt transport, NTCP also serves as a binding site for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis D virus. Understanding the HBV and HDV binding mechanism to NTCP may aid in the development of new viral inhibitors. Structure Fig. 2: cartoon depiction of NTCP topology. The panel domain is shown in red and the core domain is shown in blue. Each of the 9 transmembrane α helices are labeled and oriented according to their position embedded in the membrane. Overview NTCP is one continuous polypeptide chain containing 9 transmembrane alpha helices. The N-terminus of the polypeptide chain extrudes into the extracellular region of the plasma membrane while the C-terminus juts into the intracellular region. NTCP contains Two distinct sub domains: a core domain and a panel domain, which together channel opening and bile salt transport (Fig. 2). The core domain (blue) contains 6 transmembrane α helices (TM2-4 and TM7-9) and demonstrates two-fold pseudosymmetry. The panel domain (red) consists of 3 transmembrane α helices (TM1 and TM5-6) and is asymmetrical. Within the core domain, a unique crossover between TM-3 and TM-8 creates an X motif. The X motif contains the substrate binding site and essential residues for the conformational change required for transport. The core and panel domains are also connected by both extracellular and intracellular connector helices that are separate from the 9 transmembrane alpha helices. Binding Sites Sodium NTCP, among others in the SLC10 family, have two sodium binding sites. Many polar and negatively charged residues are characteristic of these active sites. The high level of conservation among sodium binding placement and interacting residues suggests sodium binding is coupled to bile salt transport. Additional mutations in the X-motif near sodium binding sites have shown that bile salt transport function is lost. This suggests sodium binding impacts bile salt binding. It is understood that sodium binding and release facilitates changes from open-pore to inward-facing states of NTCP. The inward-facing state is favored in the absence of sodium ions, while the open-pore state is favored in the presence of sodium ions. This also allows for sodium concentrations to regulate the uptake of taurocholates. When intracellular sodium levels are higher, the open-pore state is favored allowing for the diffusion of taurocholates. However, when extracellular sodium levels are high, the inward-facing state is favored preventing diffusion of taurocholates. Bile Salts Along with the sodium binding sites, the amphipathic pore is also characteristic of NTCP bile salt binding. The pore surface remains Hydrophobic, while lining of the open pore state is largely Polar. However, in the inward-facing, or closed-pore, conformation the polar pore residues are inaccessible. When the pore is closed only the surface hydrophobic residues are observed. As the pore opens up inner polar residues become accessible allowing for the binding of substrates. The pattern of hydrophobic and polar residues within the pore is believed to follow similar amphipathic patterns within taurocholate and other NTCP substrates, such as steroids and thyroid hormones. Thus the channel provides specificity while preventing leakage of other substrates. When observing the relevant bile salt binding residues it is shown that some residues form Van der Waals interactions while others will form dipole-dipole or ionic interactions with bile salt substrates. The core domain appears to contribute most of the polar domains, while the panel domain contributes more hydrophobic residues. Conformational Change Fig. 3: NTCP shown as cartoons with panel and core domains colored. Helices are moving from open-pore to inward-facing conformation (7PQQ to 7PQG) Fig. 4: NTCP surface representation with panel and core domains colored. Domains are moving from open-pore to inward-facing conformation (7PQQ to 7PQG) In order to reveal these binding sites to initiate bile salt transport, NTCP exists in two different conformations; the open pore conformation and the inward facing conformation. NTCP undergoes a conformational change from inward facing to open pore which exposes the binding sites to the extracellular region to allow the sodium ions and bile salts to bind. In this movement, the core domain and the panel domain rotate 20° with the panel domain moving 5 Å away from the core domain, which remains relatively rigid. This conformational change reveals the two sodium ion binding sites as well as the amphipathic pore in the membrane. The movement of the panel domain is facilitated by proline and glycine residues located in the connector helices between the panel and core domains. These residues (yellow) act as hinges that assist in the movement of the panel domain away from the core domain. Bile Salt Transport Fig. 5: Proposed process of NTCP bile salt transport A proposed pathway for NTCP bile salt transport suggests that both sodium ions are translocated with the transport of one bile salt. Initally all ligands and sodium ions are bound then both sodium ions are released along with the inner bile salt into the cytoplasm (Fig. 5). The outermost bile salt remains bound however in the pore, likely helping to prevent leakage. The outer bile salt is displaced into the inner bile salt placement by the movement of sodium ions that facilitates the conformational change to the inward-facing, pore inaccessible conformation (Fig. 5). It utilizes an elevator-alternating mechanism where one domain (core) does most of the translocation, and the other domain (panel) remains stationary. Sodium ions then bind to NTCP, favoring the open-pore state and also allowing for the binding of another outer bile salt (Fig 5). The protein is then reset and the process can then start again releasing the next inner bile salt with the translocation of the sodium ions into the cytoplasm. HBV Binding and Infection NTCP is the only entry receptor into the liver for HBV. The myristolated PreS1 domain of HBV binds to NTCP through a hydrophobic patch containing residues 157-165 on the open pore surface. These residues form part of the tunnel resulting in HBV binding and bile salt transport directly competing and interfering with one another. Another hydrophobic patch consisting of residues 84-87 found on the N-terminus of NTCP does not overlap with bile salt binding and may be used for the development of antivirals that don't inhibit bile uptake . Other minor variations within NTCP provide species specificity for HBV or virus resistance, such as mutant S267F found in East Asia. The exact mechanism by which NTCP mediates viral internalization is still yet to be determined; however, current studies speculate it works through endocytosis. Once HBV is bound the NTCP/HBV complex is taken into the cell where viral contents are dumped into the cytoplasm to then begin viral replication. It is currently unknown whether HBV also interacts with other receptors or host cell factors, but NTCP alone is not sufficient for infection.

Student Contributors

• Isabelle White

• Lena Barko