ConSurfDB vs. ConSurf: Difference between revisions

Line 171:

[[FirstGlance in Jmol]] displays <scene name='39/399854/4dnw_consurf_apd-point48/2'>all salt bridges</scene> with one click (Tools tab), colored by conservation (if pre-processed by the ConSurf Server), and can list them, '''spreadsheet-ready, including conservation level numbers, and marking those between chains'''.

With the default ConSurf Server result '''APD 1.42''', and with a custom ConSurf Server result '''APD 0.91''', the salt-bridged residues have about '''average''' conservation. With a custom result '''APD 0.48''', the between-chain salt bridges have '''above-average''' conservation (7.6 vs. 6.8), while the within-chain salt bridges have below average conservation (6.3 vs. 6.8). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.''' The difference is '''statistically significant''' (p < 0.01<ref name="stats">With APD 0.48, mean conservation of between-chain salt bridged atoms is 7.57 ± 0.13 SEM. Subtracting 3 SEM (99% confidence limit) gives 7.18. This does not overlap with either 7.16 (the all-salt-bridged atoms mean + 3 SEM) or 6.82 (the mean for ~~NOT between chains~~ salt-bridged atoms + 3 SEM).</ref>).

With the default ConSurf Server result '''APD 1.42''', and with a custom ConSurf Server result '''APD 0.91''', the salt-bridged residues have about '''average''' conservation. With a custom result '''APD 0.48''', the between-chain salt bridges have '''above-average''' conservation (7.6 vs. 6.8), while the within-chain salt bridges have below average conservation (6.3 vs. 6.8). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.''' The difference is '''statistically significant''' (p < 0.01<ref name="stats">With APD 0.48, mean conservation of between-chain salt bridged atoms is 7.57 ± 0.13 SEM. Subtracting 3 SEM (99% confidence limit) gives 7.18. This does not overlap with either 7.16 (the all-salt-bridged atoms mean + 3 SEM) or 6.82 (the mean for within-chain salt-bridged atoms + 3 SEM).</ref>).

Line 236:

</tr>

</table>

*Averages are per atom for 44 salt-bridged ~~atom pairs between chains~~, and 70 within ~~chains~~.

*Averages are per atom for 88 between-chains salt-bridged atoms, and 140 within chain salt-bridged atoms. SEM's were calculated as standard deviation divided by the square root of the atom counts. Differences for APD 0.48 are statistically significant, p < 0.01<ref name="stats" />.

*Salt bridges are Lys or Arg sidechain nitrogens within 4.0 Å of Asp or Glu sidechain oxygens.

ConSurfDB vs. ConSurf: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Tools

@@ Line 171: / Line 171: @@
 [[FirstGlance in Jmol]] displays <scene name='39/399854/4dnw_consurf_apd-point48/2'>all salt bridges</scene> with one click (Tools tab), colored by conservation (if pre-processed by the ConSurf Server), and can list them, '''spreadsheet-ready, including conservation level numbers, and marking those between chains'''.
-With the default ConSurf Server result '''APD 1.42''', and with a custom ConSurf Server result '''APD 0.91''', the salt-bridged residues have about '''average''' conservation. With a custom result '''APD 0.48''', the between-chain salt bridges have '''above-average''' conservation (7.6 vs. 6.8), while the within-chain salt bridges have below average conservation (6.3 vs. 6.8). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.''' The difference is '''statistically significant''' (p < 0.01<ref name="stats">With APD 0.48, mean conservation of between-chain salt bridged atoms is 7.57 &plusmn; 0.13 SEM. Subtracting 3 SEM (99% confidence limit) gives 7.18. This does not overlap with either 7.16 (the all-salt-bridged atoms mean + 3 SEM) or 6.82 (the mean for NOT between chains salt-bridged atoms + 3 SEM).</ref>).
+With the default ConSurf Server result '''APD 1.42''', and with a custom ConSurf Server result '''APD 0.91''', the salt-bridged residues have about '''average''' conservation. With a custom result '''APD 0.48''', the between-chain salt bridges have '''above-average''' conservation (7.6 vs. 6.8), while the within-chain salt bridges have below average conservation (6.3 vs. 6.8). In conclusion, when the multiple sequence alignment is limited to sequences closely related to the query (APD 0.48), '''between-chain salt bridged residues are more conserved than are within-chain salt bridged residues.''' The difference is '''statistically significant''' (p < 0.01<ref name="stats">With APD 0.48, mean conservation of between-chain salt bridged atoms is 7.57 &plusmn; 0.13 SEM. Subtracting 3 SEM (99% confidence limit) gives 7.18. This does not overlap with either 7.16 (the all-salt-bridged atoms mean + 3 SEM) or 6.82 (the mean for within-chain salt-bridged atoms + 3 SEM).</ref>).
 <table class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;">
@@ Line 236: / Line 236: @@
 </tr>
 </table>
-*Averages are per atom for 44 salt-bridged atom pairs between chains, and 70 within chains.
+*Averages are per atom for 88 between-chains salt-bridged atoms, and 140 within chain salt-bridged atoms. SEM's were calculated as standard deviation divided by the square root of the atom counts. Differences for APD 0.48 are statistically significant, p < 0.01<ref name="stats" />.
 *Salt bridges are Lys or Arg sidechain nitrogens within 4.0 &Aring; of Asp or Glu sidechain oxygens.