HOAT1: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
*Its binding site overlaps with both Site 1 (partially) and Site 3. | *Its binding site overlaps with both Site 1 (partially) and Site 3. | ||
*In the binding pocket of Site 1, surrounded by 16 residues located within a 5 A ˚ (M31, N35, M142, V145, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, K382, D378, F438, S462, A465, R466, and S469). | |||
*It engages in specific, high-affinity interactions with key residues: | *It engages in specific, high-affinity interactions with key residues: | ||
| Line 137: | Line 139: | ||
:*'''Path A''' (between TM2 and TM11) is narrowed from ~5 Å to ~4 Å. | :*'''Path A''' (between TM2 and TM11) is narrowed from ~5 Å to ~4 Å. | ||
:*'''Path B''' (between TM5 and TM8) is completely blocked. | :*'''Path B''' (between TM5 and TM8) is completely blocked. Restriction of the access route to path B likely limits the entry of substrates to Site 1 and the exit of substrates from the binding pocket. | ||
This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | ||
'''3. Locked Conformation''' | '''3. Locked Conformation''' | ||
By constricting the cytoplasmic access routes, probenecid does not just compete for the substrate-binding site; it stabilizes the transporter in an apo-like, inward-facing conformation that is inaccessible to cytosolic substrates. This prevents the entry of new substrates and likely traps the transporter in this non-functional state, effectively "locking" it and preventing the conformational changes necessary for the transport cycle. | |||