HOAT1: Difference between revisions
From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Structure Tour== | ==Structure Tour== | ||
<StructureSection load='9kkk' size='340' side='right'caption='Cryo-EM structure of human SLC22A6 (OAT1) in the apo-state, [[Resolution|resolution]] 3.85Å' scene=''> | <StructureSection load='9kkk' size='340' side='right'caption='Cryo-EM structure of human SLC22A6 (OAT1) in the apo-state, [[Resolution|resolution]] 3.85Å' scene=''> | ||
Classification: MEMBRANE PROTEIN | Classification: MEMBRANE PROTEIN | ||
| Line 42: | Line 41: | ||
Funding Organization(s): National Research Foundation (NRF, Korea) | Funding Organization(s): National Research Foundation (NRF, Korea) | ||
'''Experimental Data Snapshot''' | '''Experimental Data Snapshot''' | ||
| Line 116: | Line 114: | ||
The structural and functional analysis of <scene name='85/857155/Olsmartin/1'>hOAT1 in complex with the high-affinity antihypertensive drug olmesartan</scene> provides a detailed blueprint for substrate specificity and binding. | The structural and functional analysis of <scene name='85/857155/Olsmartin/1'>hOAT1 in complex with the high-affinity antihypertensive drug olmesartan</scene> provides a detailed blueprint for substrate specificity and binding. | ||
*Olmesartan binds within the central cavity of hOAT1 in an inward-facing conformation where it occupies Site 3 of the binding pocket. The drug adopts a diagonal orientation relative to the membrane plane, a pose that requires more space than the smaller inhibitor probenecid. | |||
*Olmesartan occupies Site 3 of the binding pocket and is located within 5A˚ distance of residues of TM1, TM4, TM5, TM7, TM10, and TM11, namely N35, M207, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, F438, F442, S462, and R466. | |||
===Mechanism of OAT1 inhibition by probenecid=== | ===Mechanism of OAT1 inhibition by probenecid=== | ||
| Line 141: | Line 123: | ||
'''1. Binding Mode and Direct Competition''' | '''1. Binding Mode and Direct Competition''' | ||
*Probenecid binds at the top of the central cavity, parallel to the membrane plane. | *Probenecid binds at the top of the central cavity, parallel to the membrane plane. Its binding site overlaps with both Site 1 (partially) and Site 3. | ||
*In the binding pocket of Site 1, surrounded by 16 residues located within a 5 A ˚ (M31, N35, M142, V145, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, K382, D378, F438, S462, A465, R466, and S469). | *In the binding pocket of Site 1, surrounded by 16 residues located within a 5 A ˚ (M31, N35, M142, V145, G227, Y230, W346, Y353, Y354, K382, D378, F438, S462, A465, R466, and S469). | ||
'''2. Conformational Arrest and Cytoplasmic Path Blockage''' | '''2. Conformational Arrest and Cytoplasmic Path Blockage''' | ||
The primary inhibitory mechanism is a probenecid-induced conformational change that physically blocks substrate access and exit. | The primary inhibitory mechanism is a probenecid-induced conformational change that physically blocks substrate access and exit. Compared to the apo state, the cytoplasmic opening of the binding pocket narrows from ~15 Å to ~12 Å in the probenecid-bound state. Probenecid binding narrows Path A and completely blocks Path B. Restriction of the access route to path B likely limits the entry of substrates to Site 1 and the exit of substrates from the binding pocket. | ||
This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | This structural rearrangement is caused by a slight inward movement of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5, TM8, TM10, and TM11 toward the binding pocket. | ||
| Line 172: | Line 136: | ||
By constricting the cytoplasmic access routes, probenecid does not just compete for the substrate-binding site; it stabilizes the transporter in an apo-like, inward-facing conformation that is inaccessible to cytosolic substrates. This prevents the entry of new substrates and likely traps the transporter in this non-functional state, effectively "locking" it and preventing the conformational changes necessary for the transport cycle. | By constricting the cytoplasmic access routes, probenecid does not just compete for the substrate-binding site; it stabilizes the transporter in an apo-like, inward-facing conformation that is inaccessible to cytosolic substrates. This prevents the entry of new substrates and likely traps the transporter in this non-functional state, effectively "locking" it and preventing the conformational changes necessary for the transport cycle. | ||
===Mechanistic Insights into hOAT1 Function and Inhibition=== | ===Mechanistic Insights into hOAT1 Function and Inhibition=== | ||
| Line 182: | Line 144: | ||
conformation change for inhibition (apo-like conformation).]] | conformation change for inhibition (apo-like conformation).]] | ||
''' | ''' A Dual-Mechanism for Potent Inhibition by Probenecid''' | ||
The study reveals that the classic inhibitor probenecid employs a sophisticated, dual-mechanism to arrest OAT1 function, moving beyond simple competition. | The study reveals that the classic inhibitor probenecid employs a sophisticated, dual-mechanism to arrest OAT1 function, moving beyond simple competition. | ||
| Line 190: | Line 152: | ||
'''Conformational Arrest:''' More significantly, probenecid binding induces subtle conformational changes in the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane helices (TM5, TM8, TM10, TM11). This leads to a constriction of the cytosolic opening, completely blocking one access path (Path B) and narrowing the other (Path A). This physically prevents substrates from entering or exiting the binding site from the cytoplasm, effectively "locking" the transporter in an inactive, inward-facing state. This mechanism is reminiscent of inhibition seen in other transporters like hURAT1, suggesting it may be a general strategy for effective transport arrest. | '''Conformational Arrest:''' More significantly, probenecid binding induces subtle conformational changes in the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane helices (TM5, TM8, TM10, TM11). This leads to a constriction of the cytosolic opening, completely blocking one access path (Path B) and narrowing the other (Path A). This physically prevents substrates from entering or exiting the binding site from the cytoplasm, effectively "locking" the transporter in an inactive, inward-facing state. This mechanism is reminiscent of inhibition seen in other transporters like hURAT1, suggesting it may be a general strategy for effective transport arrest. | ||
===Conclusion=== | |||
rOAT1 structures with probenecid have been reported previously, <ref>Parker, J.L., Kato, T., Kuteyi, G., Sitsel, O., and Newstead, S. (2023). | |||
Molecular basis for selective uptake and elimination of organic anions in | |||
the kidney by OAT1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1786–1793. https://doi. | |||
org/10.1038/s41594-023-01039-y.</ref> and our hOAT1 structures align with findings for rOAT1 and provide new insights into the mechanism by which probenecid inhibits transport activity. Additionally, this study reveals the structure of hOAT1 with olmesartan, offering mechanistic insights into species-specific differences in OAT1 transport of specific substrates. | |||
==Notes & References== | ==Notes & References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||