User:James D Watson/Structural Templates: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:
Serine proteases are found in a number of organisms but common to their function is the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. These enzymes catalyse the reaction using a highly reactive serine residue to attack the carbonyl group of the backbone to be hydrolysed. The chemistry of this reaction and the regeneration of the active site, requires the presence of the Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad. In chymotrypsin these residues are (Ser-195, His-57 and Asp-102) whereas in the bacterial subtilisin the site is formed by (Ser-221, His-64 and Asp-32). These two proteins are evolutionary unrelated and this is the classic example of convergent evolution to solve the problem of peptide bond hydrolysis.  
Serine proteases are found in a number of organisms but common to their function is the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. These enzymes catalyse the reaction using a highly reactive serine residue to attack the carbonyl group of the backbone to be hydrolysed. The chemistry of this reaction and the regeneration of the active site, requires the presence of the Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad. In chymotrypsin these residues are (Ser-195, His-57 and Asp-102) whereas in the bacterial subtilisin the site is formed by (Ser-221, His-64 and Asp-32). These two proteins are evolutionary unrelated and this is the classic example of convergent evolution to solve the problem of peptide bond hydrolysis.  


The detection of these types of motif is almost impossible by looking at the amino acid sequence: there is no evolutionary relationship to detect, the residues are ordered differently in the sequence, and the spacing between the residues also varies. These motifs can be detected relativeley easily however if one uses structural comparisons. The subtilisin and chymotrypsin catalytic triads are shown superposed here - note that the global folds of these two proteins are very different so the site could not have been detected that way.
The detection of these types of motif is almost impossible by looking at the amino acid sequence: there is no evolutionary relationship to detect, the residues are ordered differently in the sequence, and the spacing between the residues also varies. These motifs can be detected relativeley easily using structural comparison, particularly the template-based motif detection algorithms (some of which are listed in table 2 below). The subtilisin and chymotrypsin catalytic triads are shown superposed here - note that the global folds of these two proteins are very different so the site could not have been detected using such methods.
 
This is the principle that guides template
 
 
QUESTIONS
 
The following interactive question(s) require you to interact with the structure to arrive at the correct answer. You may use any of the visualization controls or the dropdown menus to help you to answer the questions - direct manipulation of the structure may be required.
 
 
Question 1- Load structure
 
 
The α heilix and β sheets we've been looking at are parts of the ribosomal protein L9. It is composed of two globular domains with a very long α-helix between them. Given this image of L9 in spacefill, colored by element, use the Jmol menu to change the display to so that you can clearly see both (1) the pattern of the protein chain and (2) the default colors for secondary structure.
 
View Answer
 
Question 2 - Load structure
Explore the Jmol menu to find commands relating to hydrogen bonds. Given this display of the backbone of ribosomal L9, display the hydrogen bonds that stabilize secondary structres.
View Answer
 
<applet load='5p21' size='350' frame='true' align='left' script='James_D_Watson/Proteins_Intro/Superposition_ras_structures/1' />
<applet load='5p21' size='350' frame='true' align='right' script='James_D_Watson/Proteins_Intro/Superposition_ras_ploops/2' />