This Sandbox is Reserved from 15/11/2014, through 15/05/2015 for use in the course "Biomolecule" taught by Bruno Kieffer at the Strasbourg University. This reservation includes 3fe9 through 3cdn.
To get started:
Click the edit this page tab at the top. Save the page after each step, then edit it again.
Click the 3D button (when editing, above the wikitext box) to insert Jmol.
show the Scene authoring tools, create a molecular scene, and save it. Copy the green link into the page.
Add a description of your scene. Use the buttons above the wikitext box for bold, italics, links, headlines, etc.
The protein AmelASP1 has been identified in the antennae from the honeybee A.mellifera. Its primary sequence is a 144 amino acids polypeptide with a molecular weight of 13.180 kDa.
AmelASP1 is part of the Pheromone Binding Protein (PBP) family.
The 3D representation shown below was obtained at pH 5.5 using the nano-drops technique.
The C terminal(scene) domain of this molecule presents a characteristic PBP-GOP domain. While this protein is composed of 144 residues the domain PBP begin at the 25th residue. AmelASP1 binds its ligand at low pH and releases it at neutral pH.
H7: residues 96–112 (rarely mentionned in publications because of its tiny size)
H1 has a break in the hydrogen-bonding pattern of its structure, forming tight substitute hydrogen bonds with water molecules. Thus, it results in a kink (at residue Ala 14) induced by a disruption in the helical conformation, due to hydrogen bonds with water molecules.
Components implicated in the structure rigidity
AmelASP1 presents three disulfide bridges which are greatly enhancing its structure’s rigidity by linking four of the helices together. The six cysteines and their interval spacing are the most striking features shared by proteins belonging to the PBP family.
Furthermore, non covalent bonds also play an important role.
Indeed, at pH 5.5, among the numerous other, two hydrogene bonds are particularly noticeable because of their importance in the formation of the loop stabilizing H4. One is established by Asp 66 and Leu 58 whereas the second is formed between Asp 60 and Ala 63.
Cavity
The dynamic structure of the protein is responsible of the ligand’s binding by adjustment of position. The structure looses its flexibility when CMJ binds. The successful delivery of the effector to the receptor relies on this property. The ligand binding pocket consists in a cavity formed by the helices H2, H4 and H5(scene), arranged in a globular shape which leads to a clear separation of the
ligand from the hydrophilic environment.
The top of the cavity is not closed and can establish contacts with the solvent. The cavity is prone to accept ligand such as 9-ODA because of its specific composition. Indeed, cavity's components are mainly hydrophobic and aromatic.They consequently interact with the ligand's hydrophobic carbon chain and are localized on the internal face of the helix.Thus, it implies that these residues respect a regular distance pattern in the primary structure of the AmelASP1.
3bfa The same protein in complex with the QMP at pH 5.5
3bfb The same protein in complex with the 9-ODA at pH 5.5
3bfh The same protein in complex with the HDOA at pH 5.5
3bjh The same protein in complex with the nBBSA at pH 5.5
3cyz The same protein in complex with the 9-ODA at pH 7.0
3cz0 The same protein in complex with the QMP at pH 7.0
3cz1 The same protein in complex with the nBBSA at pH 7.0
3cab The same protein in complex with the nBBSA soaked at pH 7.0
Relevance
Structural highlights
This is a sample scene created with SAT to color by Group, and another to make a transparent representation of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes.
↑Pesenti ME, Spinelli S, Bezirard V, Briand L, Pernollet JC, Tegoni M, Cambillau C. Structural basis of the honey bee PBP pheromone and pH-induced conformational change. J Mol Biol. 2008 Jun 27;380(1):158-69. Epub 2008 Apr 27. PMID:18508083 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.048
↑Pesenti ME, Spinelli S, Bezirard V, Briand L, Pernollet JC, Campanacci V, Tegoni M, Cambillau C. Queen bee pheromone binding protein pH-induced domain swapping favors pheromone release. J Mol Biol. 2009 Jul 31;390(5):981-90. Epub 2009 May 28. PMID:19481550 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.067
↑Han L, Zhang YJ, Zhang L, Cui X, Yu J, Zhang Z, Liu MS. Operating mechanism and molecular dynamics of pheromone-binding protein ASP1 as influenced by pH. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e110565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110565., eCollection 2014. PMID:25337796 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110565
↑Lartigue A, Gruez A, Briand L, Blon F, Bezirard V, Walsh M, Pernollet JC, Tegoni M, Cambillau C. Sulfur single-wavelength anomalous diffraction crystal structure of a pheromone-binding protein from the honeybee Apis mellifera L. J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb 6;279(6):4459-64. Epub 2003 Oct 31. PMID:14594955 doi:10.1074/jbc.M311212200