This Sandbox is Reserved from Jan 13 through September 1, 2020 for use in the course CH462 Biochemistry II taught by R. Jeremy Johnson at the Butler University, Indianapolis, USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1598 through Sandbox Reserved 1627.
To get started:
Click the edit this page tab at the top. Save the page after each step, then edit it again.
show the Scene authoring tools, create a molecular scene, and save it. Copy the green link into the page.
Add a description of your scene. Use the buttons above the wikitext box for bold, italics, links, headlines, etc.
ABCG2 Multidrug Transporter. Green represents residues in monomer A; Purple represents residues in monomer B. Blue is used to highlight areas of interest in select scenes. (PDB Codes: 5NJ36HBU6HCO6FFC)
The ABCG2 multidrug transporter is a membrane protein from the ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporter family, specifically the G-subfamily. Also know as the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), ABCG2 has physiological roles in various tissue cells including the mammary gland and the blood-brain, blood-testis, and maternal-fetal barriers.[1] ABCG2 protects cells by exporting xenobiotic molecules out of the cell using ATP hydrolysis. ABCG2 also affects the pharmacokinetics of many drugs and contributes to multidrug resistance.[2]
Structural highlights
Overall Structure
ABCG2 is a homodimer with each monomer containing two domains, the nucleotide binding domain (NBD) and the transmembrane domain (TMD), which are fused together as a single peptide chain.[1] The NBD binds and processes ATP and is located inside of the cell where it is exposed to the cytosol. The TMD is responsible for binding and transporting any foreign substrates and is embedded in the cell membrane and extends into the extracellular region. (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Orientation of ABCG2 in relation to the cell membrane. (5NJ3)
ATP Bound and Unbound Conformations
As an ABC Transporter, ABCG2 exhibits ATPase activity, using the energy of ATP hydrolysis to facilitate transport. After substrate bind in the TMD, one molecule of ATP binds each NBD (2 molecules of ATP total) causing a conformational change of the overall structure from an inward-facing conformation to an outward-facing conformation. ATP coordinates with various residues and a magnesium ion in the binding site of each NBD. One molecule of ATP is hydrolyzed to transport substrates across the cell membrane while the second molecule of ATP is hydrolyzed to reset the transporter to its inward-facing conformation.[3]
Figure 2. Locations of Cavities 1 and 2 and the Leucine Plug in ABCG2. The protein is in the inward-facing conformation with Cavity 1 open to the cytosol for substrate recruitment, the Leucine Plug is intact, and Cavity 2 is completely occluded. (5NJ3)
Substrates are transported through ABCG2 via two cavities separated by a leucine plug (Figure 2). Cavity 1 acts as a multidrug binding pocket and is formed by helices at the interface of the monomers in the TMD. When ATP is not bound to the NBDs, Cavity 1 is open to the cytosol in order to recruit substrates for transport. Cavity 1 is narrow and full of nonpolar, hydrophobic residues and, as a result, prefers nonpolar, hydrophobic substrates, particularly flat, polycyclic molecules. Substrates, such as estrone sulfate, form hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions with residues from each subunit in Cavity 1.[1]
After substrates bind in Cavity 1, ATP binds each NBD leading to the transporter shifting from inward-facing to outward-facing. The outward-facing conformation results in the collapse of Cavity 1 in the TMD in which the cavity is no longer open to the cytosol. This collapse forces the substrate to move forward to Cavity 2 as there is no longer room in Cavity 1 to accommodate substrates.[2]Cavity 2, which is occluded when the protein in is the inward-facing conformation, is now open to the extracellular space and able to release the substrate. Cavity 2 contains a less hydrophobic environment and, as a result, substrates are released due to hydrophobic mismatch.[1]Disulfide bonds in the external loops near the exit of Cavity 2 also help promote substrate release.[2] Once Cavity 2 is empty, the protein reverts to the inward-facing conformation via hydrolysis of ATP.
Cavities 1 and 2 are separated by a leucine plug which likely acts as a substrate check-point during transport; changes to either of these leucine residues have exhibited an increase in transport and a decrease in substrate specificity.[2] After the substrate binds Cavity 1 and ATP molecules bind each NBD, the leucine plug opens to allow the substrate to enter Cavity 2. Once the substrate enters Cavity 2, the plug is able to reform and promote substrate release and conversion to the inward-facing conformation.
Disease
Dysfunctions in ABCG2 are linked to hyperuricemia which can lead to gout, kidney disease, and hypertension, all of which are thought to be the result of impaired transport of uric acid. Additionally, the expression of ABCG2 has been found to correlate with a poor prognosis and treatment outcome of various cancers including breast, ovarian, and lung.[4]
Cancer
ABCG2 hinders cancer treatment by contributing to multidrug resistance in tumor cells. ABCG2 exports xenbiotics, including vital anti-cancer drugs, which results in the inability to treat cancer cells. Cancer patients typically show high levels of expression of multiple ABC transporters. For example, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an increased expression of ABCB1, ABCG1, and ABCG2 while childhood AML shows an increased expression in ABCA3, ABCB1, ABCC3, and ABCG2.[5][6] Additionally, pancreatic cancer has shown an upregulation of ABCB4, ABCB11, ABCC1, ABCC3, ABCC5, ABCC10, and ABCG2.[7]
The substrate specificity among ABC transporters varies so this protein family can collectively export a wide variety of substrates and, ultimately, a wide variety of anticancer drugs. ABCG2 has been known to export anticancer drugs such methotrexate, mitoxantrone, topotecan, irinotecan, and flavopiridol[8]. Due to the high expression of multiple ABC transporters in cancer cells, simultaneous treatment of multiple transporters would likely be necessary for successful cancer treatment.
Inhibitors
ABCG2 hinders cancer treatment by contributing to multidrug resistance in tumor cells. ABCG2 exports xenbiotics, including vital anti-cancer drugs, which results in the inability to treat cancer cells. The inhibition of ABCG2 would decrease the transport of anti-cancer drugs out of cancer cells and aid in the treatment of cancer. Due to the potential for ABCG2 inhibition to aid in cancer treatment, efforts have been made to develop specific inhibitors of ABCG2 and other ABC transporters. The ABC transporter ABCB1, also known as multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1), was a therapeutic target in previous studies which produced three generations of MDR1 inhibitors, such as verapamil, valspodar, and zosuquidar; however, many of these inhibitors had neurotoxic effects that discouraged their use as anticancer drugs.[9][10][11]
ABCG2 inhibitors that bind Cavity 1, acting as competitive inhibitors against ABCG2 substrates. Depending on the size of the inhibitor, one or two molecules can accommodate binding to the cavity and form hydrogen bonds, van der Waals, and stacking interactions within the binding site.[4] Many inhibitors are too big to be transported via the leucine plug resulting in the "clogging" of the transporter. With inhibitors acting as wedges, ABCG2 is locked in the inward-facing conformation and unable to transport molecules out of the cell.[2]
↑ 1.01.11.21.3Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Taylor
↑ 2.02.12.22.32.42.5Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Manolaridis
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Robey
↑ 4.04.1Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Jackson
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Marzac
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Bartholomae
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Mohelnikova-Duchonova
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Mao
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Leonard
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Binkhathlan
↑Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Witherspoon
↑Taylor NMI, Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Kowal J, Stahlberg H, Locher KP. Structure of the human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nature. 2017 Jun 22;546(7659):504-509. doi: 10.1038/nature22345. Epub 2017 May, 29. PMID:28554189 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature22345
↑Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Taylor NMI, Kowal J, Stahlberg H, Locher KP. Cryo-EM structures of a human ABCG2 mutant trapped in ATP-bound and substrate-bound states. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7731):426-430. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3. Epub 2018 Nov, 7. PMID:30405239 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3
↑Robey RW, Pluchino KM, Hall MD, Fojo AT, Bates SE, Gottesman MM. Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Jul;18(7):452-464. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8. PMID:29643473 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8
↑Jackson SM, Manolaridis I, Kowal J, Zechner M, Taylor NMI, Bause M, Bauer S, Bartholomaeus R, Bernhardt G, Koenig B, Buschauer A, Stahlberg H, Altmann KH, Locher KP. Structural basis of small-molecule inhibition of human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018 Apr;25(4):333-340. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0049-1. Epub, 2018 Apr 2. PMID:29610494 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41594-018-0049-1
↑Marzac C, Garrido E, Tang R, Fava F, Hirsch P, De Benedictis C, Corre E, Lapusan S, Lallemand JY, Marie JP, Jacquet E, Legrand O. ATP Binding Cassette transporters associated with chemoresistance: transcriptional profiling in extreme cohorts and their prognostic impact in a cohort of 281 acute myeloid leukemia patients. Haematologica. 2011 Sep;96(9):1293-301. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.031823. Epub, 2011 May 23. PMID:21606172 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.031823
↑Bartholomae S, Gruhn B, Debatin KM, Zimmermann M, Creutzig U, Reinhardt D, Steinbach D. Coexpression of Multiple ABC-Transporters is Strongly Associated with Treatment Response in Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Feb;63(2):242-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25785. Epub 2015 Oct, 29. PMID:26512967 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25785
↑Mohelnikova-Duchonova B, Brynychova V, Oliverius M, Honsova E, Kala Z, Muckova K, Soucek P. Differences in transcript levels of ABC transporters between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and nonneoplastic tissues. Pancreas. 2013 May;42(4):707-16. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318279b861. PMID:23462326 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e318279b861
↑Mao Q, Unadkat JD. Role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug transport--an update. AAPS J. 2015 Jan;17(1):65-82. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9668-6. Epub 2014 Sep 19. PMID:25236865 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9668-6
↑Binkhathlan Z, Lavasanifar A. P-glycoprotein inhibition as a therapeutic approach for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer: current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013 Mar;13(3):326-46. doi:, 10.2174/15680096113139990076. PMID:23369096 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/15680096113139990076
↑Witherspoon SM, Emerson DL, Kerr BM, Lloyd TL, Dalton WS, Wissel PS. Flow cytometric assay of modulation of P-glycoprotein function in whole blood by the multidrug resistance inhibitor GG918. Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Jan;2(1):7-12. PMID:9816083