Journal:JBSD:39

From Proteopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The remarkable efficiency of a Pin-II proteinase inhibitor sans two conserved disulfide bonds is due to enhanced flexibility and hydrogen-bond density in the reactive loop

Rakesh S. Joshi, Manasi Mishra, Vaijayanti A. Tamhane, Anirban Ghosh, Uddhavesh Sonavane, C. G. Suresh, Rajendra Joshi, Vidya S. Gupta and Ashok P. Giri [1]


Molecular Tour
Background: Plant proteinase Inhibitors (PIs) are ubiquitous in the plant kingdom and have been extensively studied as plant defense molecules, which inhibit hydrolytic enzymes (e.g. trypsin, colored in darkmagenta) of the insect gut [2]. Among various PI families, Serine PI Pin-II/Pot-II family displays a remarkable structural and functional diversity at the gene and protein level [3]. Wound, herbivory and stress induced up-regulation of these PIs clearly link them to plant defense [2]. Previous studies using transgenic systems or in vivo assays have positively correlated the advantage offered by Pin-II PI expression in plants against insect attack [4] [5]. Precursor proteins of Pin-II PIs consist of 1- to 8- inhibitory repeat domains (IRDs) connected by proteolytic-sensitive linkers, which releases IRD units upon cleavage. Each IRD is a peptide of around 50 aa length (colored in green) with a molecular mass of ~6 KDa. The aa sequence of IRDs shows variations, at the same time the 8 cysteine residues that form disulfide bridge are conserved (colored in yellow) [6] [7] [8] [9]. One structural feature of Pin-II IRD is a disordered loop with triple stranded β sheet scaffold. The disordered solvent exposed reactive loop is anchored by the four conserved disulfide bonds (C4-C41, C7-C25, C8-C37 and C14-C50) [10] [11]. Among the four disulfide bonds, C8-C37 has been found to be very crucial for maintaining active conformation, whereas C4-C41 has an important role in maintaining the flexibility of the reactive loop [12]. Thus, any selective loss of disulfide bond is expected to have evolutionary significance leading to functional differentiation of inhibitors [13].

[A] Functionality: To assess the effect of aa variations on activity and structural stability different biochemical studies and 20 ns MD simulations was performed on IRD structures. Inhibition kinetic studies displayed a sigmoidal pattern with increasing concentrations of the inhibitors suggesting reversible and competitive inhibition with tight binding. IRD-9 turned out to be a stronger inhibitor of bovine trypsin (IC50 ~0.0022 mM) than IRD-7 (IC50 ~0.135 mM) and IRD-12 (IC50 ~0.065 mM).

[B] Structural Variability: In accordance with the structure of a typical IRD belonging to Pin-II PI family, the predicted structures of CanPI also have three antiparallel β sheets joined by disordered loops containing the reactive site and stabilized by four disulfide bonds. It was thought that the disulfide bonds act as structural scaffold to hold the reactive site in a relatively rigid conformation and provide thermal and proteolytic stability. A single 310-helix of one turn is also present in the structure, the disordered loop is held by disulfide bond in IRD-7 and -12 whereas by a network of intra molecular hydrogen bonds in IRD-9. IRD-7 (colored in salmon) and IRD-12 (in deeppink) have 4 disulfide bonds, whereas IRD-9 (in magenta) has only 2 disulfide bonds. Furthermore, post-simulation analysis of the intramolecular hydrogen bonds illustrated that IRD-9 with two disulfide bonds (C7-C25 and C8-C37) less, has a relatively higher density of intra-molecular hydrogen bonds as compared to IRD-7 and -12. These intramolecular hydrogen bonds might be substituting the two lost disulfide bonds of IRD-9 to stabilize the protein structure in the active conformation and might be protecting the molecules from a hydrophobic collapse. The replaced serine residues in the place of two cysteines C7 and C8 in IRD-9 may be contributing to the increased number of hydrogen bonds.

[C] The molecular models of the IRD bound HaTry predicted several atomic interactions with a reactive loop of inhibitors that also explained the contribution of the solvent exposed reactive loop. There are several hydrogen bonds in the IRD-9-HaTry complex. ARG-39 from IRD-12 reactive site formed two hydrogen bonds with the residues of the HaTry active site. In case of IRD-7, side chain of LYS-39 residue of reactive loop form one hydrogen bond each, with carboxyl oxygen atom of HIS-50. MD simulations provides structural insight into an importance of inter/intra molecular hydrogen bonds and its effect on the interaction between protease and PIs. The results of this analysis were corroborated with previous reports. Post simulation analysis also explained experimentally observed increase in binding affinity, hence activity of IRD-9 towards proteases. See also [14] [15] [16] [17].

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate
  1. Joshi RS, Mishra M, Tamhane VA, Ghosh A, Sonavane U, Suresh CG, Joshi R, Gupta VS, Giri AP. The remarkable efficiency of a Pin-II proteinase inhibitor sans two conserved disulfide bonds is due to enhanced flexibility and hydrogen bond density in the reactive site loop. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2012 Dec 20. PMID:23256852 doi:10.1080/07391102.2012.745378
  2. 2.0 2.1 Green TR, Ryan CA. Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor in Plant Leaves: A Possible Defense Mechanism against Insects. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):776-7. PMID:17836138 doi:10.1126/science.175.4023.776
  3. Kong L, Ranganathan S. Tandem duplication, circular permutation, molecular adaptation: how Solanaceae resist pests via inhibitors. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9 Suppl 1:S22. PMID:18315854 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S1-S22
  4. Johnson R, Narvaez J, An G, Ryan C. Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9871-5. PMID:2602379
  5. Duan X, Li X, Xue Q, Abo-el-Saad M, Xu D, Wu R. Transgenic rice plants harboring an introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resistant. Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Apr;14(4):494-8. PMID:9630927 doi:10.1038/nbt0496-494
  6. Nielsen KJ, Heath RL, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structures of a series of 6-kDa trypsin inhibitors isolated from the stigma of Nicotiana alata. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 7;34(44):14304-11. PMID:7578034
  7. Scanlon MJ, Lee MC, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene from Nicotiana alata. Structure. 1999 Jul 15;7(7):793-802. PMID:10425681
  8. Lee MC, Scanlon MJ, Craik DJ, Anderson MA. A novel two-chain proteinase inhibitor generated by circularization of a multidomain precursor protein. Nat Struct Biol. 1999 Jun;6(6):526-30. PMID:10360353 doi:10.1038/9293
  9. Schirra HJ, Scanlon MJ, Lee MC, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. The solution structure of C1-T1, a two-domain proteinase inhibitor derived from a circular precursor protein from Nicotiana alata. J Mol Biol. 2001 Feb 9;306(1):69-79. PMID:11178894 doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4318
  10. Schirra HJ, Craik DJ. Structure and folding of potato type II proteinase inhibitors: circular permutation and intramolecular domain swapping. Protein Pept Lett. 2005 Jul;12(5):421-31. PMID:16029154
  11. Schirra HJ, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structural refinement of insecticidal plant proteinase inhibitors from Nicotiana alata. Protein Pept Lett. 2008;15(9):903-9. PMID:18991765
  12. Schirra HJ, Guarino RF, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Selective removal of individual disulfide bonds within a potato type II serine proteinase inhibitor from Nicotiana alata reveals differential stabilization of the reactive-site loop. J Mol Biol. 2010 Jan 22;395(3):609-26. Epub 2009 Nov 17. PMID:19925809 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.031
  13. Li XQ, Zhang T, Donnelly D. Selective loss of cysteine residues and disulphide bonds in a potato proteinase inhibitor II family. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 11;6(4):e18615. PMID:21494600 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018615
  14. Barrette-Ng IH, Ng KK, Cherney MM, Pearce G, Ryan CA, James MN. Structural basis of inhibition revealed by a 1:2 complex of the two-headed tomato inhibitor-II and subtilisin Carlsberg. J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 27;278(26):24062-71. Epub 2003 Apr 8. PMID:12684499 doi:10.1074/jbc.M302020200
  15. Dunse KM, Kaas Q, Guarino RF, Barton PA, Craik DJ, Anderson MA. Molecular basis for the resistance of an insect chymotrypsin to a potato type II proteinase inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 24;107(34):15016-21. Epub 2010 Aug 9. PMID:20696921 doi:10.1073/pnas.1009327107
  16. Tamhane VA, Giri AP, Kumar P, Gupta VS. Spatial and temporal expression patterns of diverse Pin-II proteinase inhibitor genes in Capsicum annuum Linn. Gene. 2009 Aug 1;442(1-2):88-98. Epub 2009 Apr 22. PMID:19393726 doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.012
  17. Tamhane VA, Chougule NP, Giri AP, Dixit AR, Sainani MN, Gupta VS. In vivo and in vitro effect of Capsicum annum proteinase inhibitors on Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Mar 11;1722(2):156-67. Epub 2005 Jan 12. PMID:15715970 doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.12.017

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Alexander Berchansky, Jaime Prilusky

This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.
Personal tools