Journal:JBSD:39
From Proteopedia

The remarkable efficiency of a Pin-II proteinase inhibitor sans two conserved disulfide bonds is due to enhanced flexibility and hydrogen-bond density in the reactive loopRakesh S. Joshi, Manasi Mishra, Vaijayanti A. Tamhane, Anirban Ghosh, Uddhavesh Sonavane, C. G. Suresh, Rajendra Joshi, Vidya S. Gupta and Ashok P. Giri [1] Molecular Tour [A] Functionality: To assess the effect of aa variations on activity and structural stability different biochemical studies and 20 ns MD simulations was performed on IRD structures. Inhibition kinetic studies displayed a sigmoidal pattern with increasing concentrations of the inhibitors suggesting reversible and competitive inhibition with tight binding. IRD-9 turned out to be a stronger inhibitor of bovine trypsin (IC50 ~0.0022 mM) than IRD-7 (IC50 ~0.135 mM) and IRD-12 (IC50 ~0.065 mM). [B] Structural Variability: In accordance with the structure of a typical IRD belonging to Pin-II PI family, the predicted structures of CanPI also have three antiparallel β sheets joined by disordered loops containing the reactive site and stabilized by four disulfide bonds. It was thought that the disulfide bonds act as structural scaffold to hold the reactive site in a relatively rigid conformation and provide thermal and proteolytic stability. A single 310-helix of one turn is also present in the structure, the disordered loop is held by disulfide bond in IRD-7 and -12 whereas by a network of intra molecular hydrogen bonds in IRD-9. IRD-7 (colored in salmon) and IRD-12 (in deeppink) have 4 disulfide bonds, whereas IRD-9 (in magenta) has only 2 disulfide bonds. Furthermore, post-simulation analysis of the intramolecular hydrogen bonds illustrated that IRD-9 with two disulfide bonds (C7-C25 and C8-C37) less, has a relatively higher density of intra-molecular hydrogen bonds as compared to IRD-7 and -12. These intramolecular hydrogen bonds might be substituting the two lost disulfide bonds of IRD-9 to stabilize the protein structure in the active conformation and might be protecting the molecules from a hydrophobic collapse. The replaced serine residues in the place of two cysteines C7 and C8 in IRD-9 may be contributing to the increased number of hydrogen bonds. [C] The molecular models of the IRD bound HaTry predicted several atomic interactions with a reactive loop of inhibitors that also explained the contribution of the solvent exposed reactive loop. There are several hydrogen bonds in the IRD-9-HaTry complex. ARG-39 from IRD-12 reactive site formed two hydrogen bonds with the residues of the HaTry active site. In case of IRD-7, side chain of LYS-39 residue of reactive loop form one hydrogen bond each, with carboxyl oxygen atom of HIS-50. MD simulations provides structural insight into an importance of inter/intra molecular hydrogen bonds and its effect on the interaction between protease and PIs. The results of this analysis were corroborated with previous reports. Post simulation analysis also explained experimentally observed increase in binding affinity, hence activity of IRD-9 towards proteases. See also [14] [15] [16] [17]. |
|
- ↑ Joshi RS, Mishra M, Tamhane VA, Ghosh A, Sonavane U, Suresh CG, Joshi R, Gupta VS, Giri AP. The remarkable efficiency of a Pin-II proteinase inhibitor sans two conserved disulfide bonds is due to enhanced flexibility and hydrogen bond density in the reactive site loop. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2012 Dec 20. PMID:23256852 doi:10.1080/07391102.2012.745378
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Green TR, Ryan CA. Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor in Plant Leaves: A Possible Defense Mechanism against Insects. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):776-7. PMID:17836138 doi:10.1126/science.175.4023.776
- ↑ Kong L, Ranganathan S. Tandem duplication, circular permutation, molecular adaptation: how Solanaceae resist pests via inhibitors. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9 Suppl 1:S22. PMID:18315854 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S1-S22
- ↑ Johnson R, Narvaez J, An G, Ryan C. Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9871-5. PMID:2602379
- ↑ Duan X, Li X, Xue Q, Abo-el-Saad M, Xu D, Wu R. Transgenic rice plants harboring an introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resistant. Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Apr;14(4):494-8. PMID:9630927 doi:10.1038/nbt0496-494
- ↑ Nielsen KJ, Heath RL, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structures of a series of 6-kDa trypsin inhibitors isolated from the stigma of Nicotiana alata. Biochemistry. 1995 Nov 7;34(44):14304-11. PMID:7578034
- ↑ Scanlon MJ, Lee MC, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene from Nicotiana alata. Structure. 1999 Jul 15;7(7):793-802. PMID:10425681
- ↑ Lee MC, Scanlon MJ, Craik DJ, Anderson MA. A novel two-chain proteinase inhibitor generated by circularization of a multidomain precursor protein. Nat Struct Biol. 1999 Jun;6(6):526-30. PMID:10360353 doi:10.1038/9293
- ↑ Schirra HJ, Scanlon MJ, Lee MC, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. The solution structure of C1-T1, a two-domain proteinase inhibitor derived from a circular precursor protein from Nicotiana alata. J Mol Biol. 2001 Feb 9;306(1):69-79. PMID:11178894 doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4318
- ↑ Schirra HJ, Craik DJ. Structure and folding of potato type II proteinase inhibitors: circular permutation and intramolecular domain swapping. Protein Pept Lett. 2005 Jul;12(5):421-31. PMID:16029154
- ↑ Schirra HJ, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Structural refinement of insecticidal plant proteinase inhibitors from Nicotiana alata. Protein Pept Lett. 2008;15(9):903-9. PMID:18991765
- ↑ Schirra HJ, Guarino RF, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Selective removal of individual disulfide bonds within a potato type II serine proteinase inhibitor from Nicotiana alata reveals differential stabilization of the reactive-site loop. J Mol Biol. 2010 Jan 22;395(3):609-26. Epub 2009 Nov 17. PMID:19925809 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.031
- ↑ Li XQ, Zhang T, Donnelly D. Selective loss of cysteine residues and disulphide bonds in a potato proteinase inhibitor II family. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 11;6(4):e18615. PMID:21494600 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018615
- ↑ Barrette-Ng IH, Ng KK, Cherney MM, Pearce G, Ryan CA, James MN. Structural basis of inhibition revealed by a 1:2 complex of the two-headed tomato inhibitor-II and subtilisin Carlsberg. J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 27;278(26):24062-71. Epub 2003 Apr 8. PMID:12684499 doi:10.1074/jbc.M302020200
- ↑ Dunse KM, Kaas Q, Guarino RF, Barton PA, Craik DJ, Anderson MA. Molecular basis for the resistance of an insect chymotrypsin to a potato type II proteinase inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 24;107(34):15016-21. Epub 2010 Aug 9. PMID:20696921 doi:10.1073/pnas.1009327107
- ↑ Tamhane VA, Giri AP, Kumar P, Gupta VS. Spatial and temporal expression patterns of diverse Pin-II proteinase inhibitor genes in Capsicum annuum Linn. Gene. 2009 Aug 1;442(1-2):88-98. Epub 2009 Apr 22. PMID:19393726 doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.012
- ↑ Tamhane VA, Chougule NP, Giri AP, Dixit AR, Sainani MN, Gupta VS. In vivo and in vitro effect of Capsicum annum proteinase inhibitors on Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Mar 11;1722(2):156-67. Epub 2005 Jan 12. PMID:15715970 doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.12.017