Synthetic nanomaterials from standardized protein blocks
From Proteopedia
In March, 2024, Huddy, Hsia, Kibler, Xu et al. in the team of David Baker (subsequently a Nobel Laureate) published a wide range of synthetic protein nanostructures self-assembled from standardized, engineered alpha-helical protein "building blocks"[1] (restore initial scene). The extensively documented report, in Nature, has 32 authors[1]. The breakthrough here is that instead of designing a single "one-off" desired nanostructure, the Baker group has first designed a series of regular building blocks that can be assembled into diverse nanostructures using straightforward geometric principles. These now enable "construction of protein nanomaterials according to ‘back of an envelope’ architectural blueprints"[1]. There are many potential applications, such as drug delivery or catalysis, which remain to be explored. For example, in 2025 Brunette et al. (Baker lab)[2] reported a multivalent ebola virus vaccine synthetic, self-assembling nanoparticle producing immunity in mice to two kinds of ebola virus.
Building BlocksTwistless helix repeat blocks
In this project, the simplest building blocks consist of anti-parallel alpha helices engineered to be straight and flat, that is twistless helix repeat (THR) protein blocks. A simple example, THR1, is 8g9j, consisting of eight anti-parallel alpha helices with seven turns per helix[3]. Each helix is amphipathic, that is, hydrophobic on the side contacting other helixes, and hydrophilic on the side facing outwards (not shown). The 2.5 Å resolution of 8g9j enabled the modeling of all helix side chains. Non-covalent interactions between helices are nearly all apolar, with a few hydrogen bonds, and two salt bridges (not shown). The block surface is designed to have many charges, making a highly water soluble building block. The edges of the block are "capped" with charges that prevent these blocks from binding to each other, thus enabling crystallization of this block rather than having it precipitate. The sequences and binding interfaces of building blocks were designed using Rosetta FastDesign and mainly ProteinMPNN[4][5][6]. Designed sequences were filtered according to likelihood of desired folding and assembly as predicted by AlphaFold2. 33 linear THRs were tested. 23 were solubly expressed. Of 19 characterized by size exclusion chromatography, 13 were primarily monomeric[1]. Five examples of building blocksDozens of types of building blocks were designed, synthesized, purified, and their structures and assemblies were determined[1]. Here are shown five examples having specified angles within or between pairs of protein chains[7]. AssembliesBuilding blocks were designed with precise angles, and with specific points of attachment between blocks. Most self-assembled into the predicted assemblies. The size of the final assembly can be controlled by the number of helices and their lengths in the building blocks. Examples of assemblies include[8]: Flat Assemblies
Cage AssembliesSynthetic genes were obtained for 13 nanocage designs; all 13 expressed solubly. Cryo-EM models of seven were symmetric cages resembling the design models[1]. These included:
Inter-Chain AdhesionsIn Tetrahedron B, each chain (block) adheres to three other chains. There are two "branch" adhesions (face to end) and one "handshake" adhesion (face-to-face). The exposed surface of each chain is covered with a mixture of positive + and negative – charges.
When you hide the three dark colored chains, you will see that they adhere to hydrophobic patches devoid of charges. However, the charges on the edges of these patches may facilitate adhesion. Animated simulation of self-assemblyThis simulation is crude and very oversimplified ... but heuristic, and hopefully fun to watch.
Alternatively, you can click the link below to get the interactive (rotatable, zoomable, and enlargable) simulation.
The Toggle Animation button works only for the interactive animation in JSMol. The popout button PDB FilesPDB files for the nano structures illustrated above are available in the supplementary materials of Huddy et al., 2024[1], or below. PDB files obtained from Huddy et al., 2024 or derived from those files are re-distributed here under the terms of the original Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Method of simulating assemblyThe cage model (Cube with no vertices Image:Huddy2024-cube-noverts-cage-o4-32.pdb.gz) has about 272,000 atoms including hydrogens. It was simplified to alpha carbon atoms only (17,256) using the Jmol.jar Java application using Jmol commands "select *.ca; write 0.pdb;". The assembled cage has 24 protein chains.
reset;center {-10.484505 11.968994 4.189499}; rotate z -0.04; rotate y 90.22; rotate z -0.42; zoom 112.62; background white select all spacefill 3.0 color chain anim mode loop 0.5 2.0; # not palindrome anim on; anim fps 8; # frames per second The first line in the above script was copied from the report by Jmol after orienting the cube as desired, and entering the command "show orientation".
|
|
See Also
- Related work from the Baker group includes Bond-centric modular design of protein assemblies by Wang et al., 2024[9].
- Metal-Ligand Polyhedra
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Huddy TF, Hsia Y, Kibler RD, Xu J, Bethel N, Nagarajan D, Redler R, Leung PJY, Weidle C, Courbet A, Yang EC, Bera AK, Coudray N, Calise SJ, Davila-Hernandez FA, Han HL, Carr KD, Li Z, McHugh R, Reggiano G, Kang A, Sankaran B, Dickinson MS, Coventry B, Brunette TJ, Liu Y, Dauparas J, Borst AJ, Ekiert D, Kollman JM, Bhabha G, Baker D. Blueprinting extendable nanomaterials with standardized protein blocks. Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8005):898-904. PMID:38480887 doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07188-4
- ↑ Brunette et al. (David Baker lab), [https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.29.635581 A Multivalent Pan-Ebolavirus Nanoparticle Vaccine Provides Protection in Rodents from Lethal Infection by Adapted Zaire and Sudan Viruses], bioRXiv Preprint, February, 2005.
- ↑ An amino-terminal histidine tag was not resolved in the electron density map of 8g9j, and thus is missing in the structure depicted.
- ↑ de Haas RJ, Brunette N, Goodson A, Dauparas J, Yi SY, Yang EC, Dowling Q, Nguyen H, Kang A, Bera AK, Sankaran B, de Vries R, Baker D, King NP. Rapid and automated design of two-component protein nanomaterials using ProteinMPNN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2314646121. PMID:38502697 doi:10.1073/pnas.2314646121
- ↑ Sumida KH, Núñez-Franco R, Kalvet I, Pellock SJ, Wicky BIM, Milles LF, Dauparas J, Wang J, Kipnis Y, Jameson N, Kang A, De La Cruz J, Sankaran B, Bera AK, Jiménez-Osés G, Baker D. Improving Protein Expression, Stability, and Function with ProteinMPNN. J Am Chem Soc. 2024 Jan 9. PMID:38194293 doi:10.1021/jacs.3c10941
- ↑ Dauparas J, Anishchenko I, Bennett N, Bai H, Ragotte RJ, Milles LF, Wicky BIM, Courbet A, de Haas RJ, Bethel N, Leung PJY, Huddy TF, Pellock S, Tischer D, Chan F, Koepnick B, Nguyen H, Kang A, Sankaran B, Bera AK, King NP, Baker D. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science. 2022 Sep 15:eadd2187. doi: 10.1126/science.add2187. PMID:36108050 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.add2187
- ↑ The five modules shown are from the following assemblies that can be downloaded as PDB files from supplementary materials of Huddy et al,, 2024: 90° from strut_C6_16. Branch from TT_rail+_tie+. Curve from R20A. Handshake 90° from cage_O4_32. Handshake obtuse angle from cage_I3_8.
- ↑ The assemblies shown can be downloaded as PDB files from supplementary materials of Huddy et al,, 2024.
- ↑ Wang S, Favor A, Kibler R, Lubner J, Borst AJ, Coudray N, Redler RL, Chiang HT, Sheffler W, Hsia Y, Li Z, Ekiert DC, Bhabha G, Pozzo LD, Baker D. Bond-centric modular design of protein assemblies. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 12:2024.10.11.617872. PMID:39416012 doi:10.1101/2024.10.11.617872